skip to page content
Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

Health Services Research & Development

Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

2008 HSR&D National Meeting Abstract


National Meeting 2008

3049 — Interactive Spaced Education Improves Providers’ Knowledge of Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kerfoot BP (VA Boston Healthcare System; Harvard Medical School), Conlin PR (VA Boston Healthcare System; Harvard Medical School; Brigham & Women's Hospital)

Objectives:
Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is frequently performed counter to clinical practice guidelines. We investigated whether an email-based educational intervention termed ‘Interactive Spaced Education’ [ISE] could improve practitioners’ knowledge of PSA screening guidelines.

Methods:
Primary care providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) in VISN 1 were recruited via email to participate in this study. Participants were stratified by hospital and block randomized into two cohorts: the ISE group received four cycles of 9 emails over a 36 week period (0-2 emails per week), while those in the control group received no intervention. Each validated email presented a clinical scenario and asked whether or not it was appropriate to perform PSA screening. Participants received immediate feedback after submission of their answers. Multiple-choice test questions were developed based on consensus PSA screening guidelines, were content-validated by three experts, and then were pilot-tested on 33 physicians. Fourteen questions were selected based on psychometric performance and were administered as an online test to both cohorts at weeks 0, 18 and 36.

Results:
Ninety-five of the 260 VISN 1 primary care providers enrolled in the trial. In the ISE group, the 4 cycles of 9 emails were completed by 84%, 88%, 94% and 92% of providers, respectively. Average Cronbach alpha reliability (internal consistency) of the test instrument was 0.71. All three tests were completed by 92% and 85% of providers in the ISE and control groups, respectively. Test 1 scores (week 0) were similar between groups (mean 72%, SD 17; p=0.9). Under an intention-to-treat analysis, the mean test scores in the ISE group were 96% (SD 8) and 95% (SD 8) for tests 2 (week 18) and 3 (week 36), respectively. Corresponding test scores in the control group were 73% (SD 20) and 76% (SD 17) [p < 0.001 for both cross-cohort comparisons]. These cross-cohort differences represent Cohen effect sizes of 1.2 and 1.1, respectively.

Implications:
ISE rapidly and significantly improves practitioners’ knowledge of PSA screening guidelines.

Impacts:
ISE is an effective email-based education system which can improve providers’ clinical knowledge across the VA system.


Questions about the HSR&D website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.