Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

Health Services Research & Development

Veterans Crisis Line Badge
Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

2008 HSR&D National Meeting Abstract

Printable View

National Meeting 2008

1055 — Patient-Centered Communication during Telemedicine versus In-Person Medical Consultations

Agha Z (VA San Diego Healthcare System), Roter D (Johns Hopkins University), Schapira R (Clement J. Zablocki Milwaukee VAMC), Laud P (Medical College of Wisconsin)

Objectives:
Physician-patient communication is associated with patient satisfaction, patient adherence to medical advice, and positive medical outcomes. Whether telemedicine has a negative impact on physician-patient communication is not known. The objective of this study was to compare physician-patient communication during telemedicine and in-person medical consultations.

Methods:
We conducted a RCT of 221 patients at Milwaukee VA hospital. Patients were randomized to in-person (IP) or telemedicine (TM) consultation. The same group of 9 physicians representing 3 specialties (pulmonary, rheumatology, and endocrine) provided an equal number of TM and IP consultations. Each physician-patient consultation was video-recorded and later analyzed using the Roter Interaction Analyses System (RIAS). The RIAS has been validated in numerous studies and is a reliable and valid measure of physician-patient communication. In this abstract we test differences in physician communication style during TM and IP visits.

Results:
Of 221 patients enrolled, 14 patients were out of study and 7 were missing video data. RIAS analyses were conducted for 200 patients (TM=100, IP=100). Linear mixed models were used for analyses, with type of visit (TM or IP) as fixed effect and physician as random effect. Patient-centered ratio (patient-centered communication categories / physician-centered communication) was similar for TM and IP visits (0.95 vs. 1.0, p=0.39). Physician data gathering on biomedical (p=0.45) and psychosocial topics (p=0.27) was similar in TM and IP visits. There was no difference in physician counseling/education (p=0.13) and patient activation (p=0.46) statements between TM and IP visits. Rapport building was higher during TM vs. IP (p=001). For each of these analyses a significant physician effect (p < 0.001) was present.

Implications:
In this study, physician communication style was not affected by telemedicine. The individual physician factor was a significant predictor of patient-centered vs. physician-centered communication. Physicians with good communication style performed well (i.e. used patient-centered communication) irrespective of type of visit (IP or TM).

Impacts:
The VHA uses telemedicine for extending clinical services to remote populations. However, there are concerns that telemedicine may have a negative effect on physician-patient communication. Our study is the first RCT with detailed content analyses that provides evidence that telemedicine technology does not impede patient-centered communication.


Questions about the HSR&D website? Email the Web Team.

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.