skip to page content
Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

Health Services Research & Development

Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

2008 HSR&D National Meeting Abstract


National Meeting 2008

3053 — What Practices Are U. S. Hospitals Using to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection and Why? A Mixed-Methods Study

Saint S (HSR&D COE, Ann Arbor), Kowalski CP (HSR&D COE, Ann Arbor), Krein SL (HSR&D COE, Ann Arbor)

Objectives:
Though urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common nosocomial infection, no national data describe what U.S. hospitals are doing to prevent this problem. We conducted a national mixed-methods study, employing both quantitative and qualitative evaluation, to describe the current practices used by U.S. hospitals – VA and non-VA – to prevent nosocomial UTI and elucidate the key factors influencing a hospital’s decision to use certain practices.

Methods:
The quantitative phase entailed mailing written surveys to infection control coordinators at a national random sample of non-VA (n = 600) and all VA hospitals (n = 119). The survey asked about practices to prevent nosocomial infection, including UTI. The qualitative phase included semi-structured interviews with 86 individuals at 14 hospitals and in-person visits to 6 geographically diverse hospitals in order to identify factors influencing the use of various practices.

Results:
The survey response rate was 72%. Overall, 30% of hospitals regularly used antimicrobial urinary catheters and portable bladder scanners; 14% regularly used condom catheters in men; and 9% regularly used catheter reminders. VA hospitals were more likely than non-VA hospitals to use bladder scanners (49% vs. 29%, p < .001), condom catheters (46% vs. 12%, p < .001), and suprapubic catheters (22% vs. 9%, p < .001); non-VA hospitals were more likely to use antimicrobial catheters (30% vs. 14%, p = .002). Several qualitative themes emerged: 1) though preventing nosocomial UTI was a low priority, the value of early catheter removal was recognized; 2) sites that made UTI prevention a high priority focused on non-infectious complications of catheter use (e.g., patient immobility) and had committed champions; and 3) external forces – such as public reporting – influenced preventive activities.

Implications:
VA hospitals differed from non-VA hospitals in the use of several practices to prevent nosocomial UTI. However, catheter reminders are used in less than 10% of both VA and non-VA facilities, despite evidence of benefit.

Impacts:
We found several practical strategies that may promote UTI preventive practices, such as highlighting non-infectious complications of catheterization, supporting a dedicated champion (who need not be a physician), and – in VA hospitals – utilizing goal-sharing teams to motivate preventive activities.


Questions about the HSR&D website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.