Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website
HSRD Conference Logo



2017 HSR&D/QUERI National Conference Abstract

Printable View

4059 — Improving Handoffs from Acute to Sub-Acute Care: A VA Interdisciplinary HFMEA Quality Improvement Project

Lead/Presenter: Amy Baughman
All Authors: Baughman AW (VA Boston Healthcare System (VABHS)) Shahood B (VABHS) Ruopp M (VABHS) Jindal S (VABHS) Vilbrun-Bruno S (VABHS) Mitchell D (VABHS) Cain G (VABHS) Swamy L (VABHS) Ronan M (VABHS) Simon SR (VABHS)

Objectives:
Communication has been cited as the most common root cause in sentinel events, with failed patient care handoffs contributing to an estimated 80% of serious preventable adverse events; handoffs to sub-acute care such as nursing homes are at particularly high risk for communication breakdown given high patient complexity and comorbidity. Our system did not have a standardized process for hospital transfers and verbal handoffs and discharge documentation were highly variable in quality, format and completion. Handoff data from June 2014 -April 2015 showed that for 159 transfers, handoff was absent for 29 transfers (18%). Our goal was to improve the handoff process from a VA hospital to a VA sub-acute care facility. Specifically: 1) Increase usage and standardize content of verbal handoff 2) Simplify communication modes 3) Decrease inappropriate transfers and delays in care (transfer, discharge summary completion)

Methods:
Setting: Our VA system includes a 400-bed acute care hospital and 112-bed sub-acute care facility. Intervention: In conjunction with Patient Safety, we conducted a Healthcare Failure Modes Effects Analysis (HFMEA) from Mar-Oct 2016. Strategy: 1) Establish Interdisciplinary Team: hospital and subacute care providers, nurses, social workers, and unit secretaries. 2) Define goals, outcomes, and a data collection system 3) Process map transfers with detailed sub-process maps 4) Conduct Failure Modes Analysis to identify failures 5) Hazard Analysis to prioritize failures based on severity and probability 6) Action Plans for high scoring failures: a) Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for transfer notification and cancellations b) Standardize verbal handoff content for nursing and providers (I-PASS: Illness severity; P: Patient summary; A: Action items; S: Situation awareness and contingency planning; S: Synthesis by receiver) c) Retrain administrative staff on travel processes

Results:
We developed 7 measures that were tracked daily from Apr-Oct 2016 (interventions began June 2016). Completion of provider Verbal handoff improved from 80 % to 100%. IPASS uptake, which was started in July, improved from 11% to 82%. Discharge documentation was high at baseline (93-96%) and remained at 95%. Nursing verbal handoffs also were high at baseline (93-100%) and remained at 100%. There were only 2 inappropriate transfers, 1 in baseline period and 1 in June. Transfers with "unfinished business" decreased from 10% to zero in the last two months. Transfers with adverse events or delays in care decreased from 13% to zero.

Implications:
The HFMEA process improved several hand-off process measures for acute care to sub-acute care transfers. Key features were sound data collection, collaboration with Patient Safety, and having an interdisciplinary team from both acute and sub-acute care.

Impacts:
A systematic QI process was essential: process maps to evaluate processes and failures, analysis to prioritize failures, and action plans to develop interventions.