» Back to Table of Contents
Understanding and addressing the needs of
rural Veterans requires complementary perspectives
including VA Central Office and
local administration, policymakers, clinicians,
researchers, and most importantly, the patient.
For example, one of the fundamental challenges
in the care of rural Veterans is distance.
However, distance can mean different things
to different people with a variety of ways to
overcome it. For some Veterans, traveling
two hours for a clinic visit can be a welcome
social event; for others, it is a barrier to obtaining
care. Policies and programs exist to bring
care closer to the Veteran including Home
Based Primary Care (HBPC), a group effort
between the Veteran, family caregiver, VA, and
the community. Other policies and programs
include telehealth, mobile clinics, and fee-basis
care. Yet each of these and other programs
has their pros and cons: HBPC may not be
cost-effective in highly rural settings; not all
Veterans have adequate connectivity for telehealth;
mobile clinics have distance, weather,
and other limitations; and fee-basis care in the
community may contribute to fragmented care.
Even defining "access" is challenging. From a
patient perspective, traveling two hours for a
simple blood test can be onerous, especially if
the service is available close to home. Yet two
hours of travel for highly specialized care like
a neurosurgeon may not be a barrier if these
services are not available closer to home. Thus,
different access standards can exist for different
services. Access barriers can manifest in other
ways such as waits and delays for care, health
professional shortages, limits in specialty services
such as mental health, and even identifying
eligible benefits.
Once access barriers have been defined, the next
step is overcoming these barriers with strategies
to meet the patient-centered needs of the
Veteran. One size does not fit all and thus these
strategies need to be combined with adequate
both program effectiveness and barriers to
implementation.
Another aspect of rural health is determining
whether disparities in quality of care exist for
rural Veterans. To date, results of studies appear
to be mixed. VA-based research has suggested
that rural Veterans have lower health-related
quality of life, yet clinical outcomes for a condition
like acute myocardial infarction appear to be
no different for rural versus non-rural Veterans.
Further, studies and analyses are critical to help
define quality disparities and then to propose
interventions to overcome them.
In an effort to understand the challenges of access
and quality, and test strategies to improve
these, the Office of Rural Health established
three field-based Veterans Rural Health Resource
Centers (VRHRC). The VRHRCs bring together
rural health experts, clinicians, researchers, administrators,
and the patient to evaluate the care
of rural Veterans and perform pilot studies to
address issues identified. The VRHRCs work
collaboratively to identify access and quality gaps
and best practices to overcome them, and then
disseminate the findings throughout VA.
The recent September 2010 State of the Art
(SOTA) conference examined issues related to
access. This HSR&D sponsored conference
brought together VA and non-VA experts in
health care access to better define the problem
and identify proven and potential future interventions
to overcome access barriers for all
Veterans--whether urban or rural. Please see accompanying
text box with information regarding
the SOTA conference.
As outlined by Dr. Skupien, ORH has the
charge and the resources to improve access and
quality of care for rural Veterans. It is thus the
responsibility of the VRHRCs, program offices,
researchers, clinicians, and facilities to understand
how we are meeting the real and perceived
needs of rural Veterans. The imperative is to
then test and implement the most cost-effective
strategies to improve access and quality of care
for all Veterans.
|