» Back to Table of Contents
Excellence in medical care is a product of
research, innovation, and a passion for patient
care. Nowhere is that more evident than
at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA). When a Veteran walks through the
door of a VA medical facility it is our responsibility
to deliver consistent, high-quality
care—regardless of where the Veteran lives.
However, in our routine efforts to identify
new treatments and deliver existing ones,
we sometimes overlook one of our most
vulnerable populations: rural Veterans. Their
advanced age, comorbidities, and combatrelated
injuries complicate their care, and
when compounded by provider shortages
and the simple reality of distance to care,
rural Veterans may find themselves at a disadvantage.
To the extent that rural Veteran
dependency on VA health care continues to
grow relative to urban reliance, it is imperative
that researchers strengthen their efforts
to focus on Secretary Shulkin's priorities of
access and modernization to give Veterans
"true choice."
It is fair to say that the demographic and
health-related characteristics that define
"rural" may well be the harbinger for what is
to come, and has lessons that will apply to an
aging, medically complex, and increasingly
reliant urban population. Rural to urban
dissemination of research and innovation in
health care is already happening in VA. The
research community knows this, and the
partnerships that the Office of Rural Health
has with so many of their number bear witness.
Nonetheless we need to do more.
The health care of America's 5.2 million
rural Veterans is at risk. While 18 percent
of the U.S. population lives in rural America,
only nine percent of primary care physicians
and seven percent of psychologists
practice there. In addition, since 2010, 1.2
million rural patients lost access to their
nearest hospital—30 of which closed in the
past two years alone.
These constraints are amplified when we
consider that over half of VA-enrolled
rural Veterans are age 65-plus.1 According
to the American Geriatric Society, those
over age 65 use a disproportionate percentage
of health care services and more
than 80 percent require care for chronic
conditions such as hypertension, arthritis,
and heart disease. Aging rural Veterans,
who need health care the most, have the
hardest time accessing it.
The Office of Rural Health (ORH) was chartered
by Congress in Public Law 109-461 "to
work with all personnel and [VA] offices to
develop, refine, and promulgate policies, best
practices, lessons learned, and innovative
and successful programs to improve care and
services for [rural] Veterans..." As we look to
solve future challenges, ORH has identified
significant research gaps in the areas of transportation,
rural women's health, and rural
mental health services.
For many rural Veterans, simply getting
to care is the challenge. An average rural
Veteran travels over 30 minutes to receive
primary care, and almost 90 minutes to receive specialized care—this is almost two
times farther than the average urban Veteran.
Telehealth technology alleviates some of the
burden for technologically savvy rural Veterans,
but long travel distances with limited
public transit, income challenges, and inclement
weather continue to significantly impact
Veterans' ability to seek medical treatment.
Further research to address, quite simply,
"how do we get rural Veterans to treatment?"
is not only necessary, but urgent.
Rural women Veterans face additional
challenges because the VA system is
underequipped to treat the 180,584 rural
women enrolled in VA for care. A study
of VA health care data found that rural
residents are less likely to receive womenspecific
health services, but more likely to
use primary care, which suggests inequity
in the availability of specialized services.
ORH works with partners to develop
programs that train practitioners on the
specific health care needs of women from gynecological health to pregnancy issues
to ovarian and cervical cancers. But more
gender-specific condition research is
needed to expand health care to our rural
women Veterans.
If we ever hope to end the plague of Veteran
suicide, we must invest more in research and
development in rural suicide prevention.
We know that of the 1.5 million Veterans
that received mental health care in 2015,
435,000 lived in rural areas. These Veterans
are more likely to experience depression
than their urban counterparts, even after
controlling for socioeconomic status and
race.2 Additionally, rural residence by itself is
a risk factor for depression among Veterans,
even after controlling for mental health care
accessibility.3 Recognizing these risks, ORH
initiated research, funded telemental health
hubs, and expanded mental health training for
clergy based in rural areas in order to combat
rates of rural Veteran suicide. To close this
perilous health care access gap, more research
and development into practical innovations
for suicide prevention is critical.
Nobody knows Veterans better than VA. And
while we offer care second to none, without
new research and innovation, VA will fall
short in caring for those who reside in rural
communities. We need researchers' help in
order to examine issues related to transportation,
women's health and suicide prevention,
but I have a larger ask. Simply, that more of
you consider making rural health care an integral
part of your models. Fully one-third of
our enrolled population is rural, and rurality
may provide unanticipated explanatory power
for both rural and urban populations. The cost
of inclusion will likely outweigh the unanticipated
cost of exclusion, and will just as likely
provide clues to the effective dissemination of
innovation based on your research. Let's flip
the urban to rural paradigm.
-
Unless otherwise noted, all Veteran data are from the
internal VHA sources at the VHA Support Services
Center, 2015.
- Jawal LM, et al. "A Population-Based Cross Sectional
Study Comparing Depression and Health Service
Deficits Between Rural and Non-rural U.S. Military
Veterans," Military Medicine, April 2015.
- Lutfiyya MN, et al. "Mental Health and Mental Health
Care in Rural America: The Hope of Redesigned
Primary Care," Disease-a-Month 2012; 58:629-38.
|