"The More They Know, the Better Care They Can Give": Patient Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care.

Nicosia FM, Spar MJ, Neumann A, Silvestrini MC, Barrientos M, Brown RT. "The More They Know, the Better Care They Can Give": Patient Perspectives on Measuring Functional Status in Primary Care. Journal of general internal medicine. 2020 Oct 1; 35(10):2947-2954.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Despite its importance to care and outcomes for older adults, functional status is seldom routinely measured in primary care. Understanding patient perspectives is necessary to develop effective, patient-centered approaches for measuring function, yet we know little about patient views on this topic. OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and caregiver perspectives on measuring activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs). DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight patients aged 65 or older and five caregivers in primary care clinics at one Veterans Affairs Medical Center. APPROACH: We conducted interviews to elicit patient and caregiver perspectives on the importance of measuring function, including preferences for method of screening and assessment, wording of questions, and provider communication style. We analyzed interviews using qualitative thematic analysis. KEY RESULTS: We identified several themes related to measuring function in primary care. First, most participants reported that measuring function is part of quality, holistic care. However, a minority of participants noted that discussing function, especially IADLs, was not medically relevant. Second, in terms of preferences for measuring function, participants noted that interdisciplinary approaches to measuring function are optimal and that face-to-face assessment is most "intimate" and can prompt reflection on one's limitations. However, some participants indicated that self-assessment is less invasive than in-person assessment. Third, participants had varied preferences regarding communicating about function. Participants noted that asking about difficulty with activities versus need for help are distinct and complementary concepts and that providing context is essential when discussing sensitive topics such as functional decline. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients and caregivers reported that measuring function was important, preferred face-to-face assessment, and emphasized the importance of providing context when asking about function. These findings suggest that incorporating patient and caregiver preferences for measuring function can improve satisfaction and experience with functional assessment in primary care.