Efficacy of adding activity of daily living simulation training to traditional pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea and health-related quality-of-life.

Mahoney K, Pierce J, Papo S, Imran H, Evans S, Wu WC. Efficacy of adding activity of daily living simulation training to traditional pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea and health-related quality-of-life. PLoS ONE. 2020 Aug 27; 15(8):e0237973.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Exercise modalities offered as part of traditional pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) do not always translate to successful performance of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and may hinder gains in patient''s sense of well-being. Data is lacking on the efficacy of incorporation of ADL-focused training in PR. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of incorporation of ADL simulation and energy-conservation training in PR as part of a quality-initiative on health-related-quality-of-life (HRQOL), dyspnea, fatigue, and six-minute-walk-test among PR patients. METHODS: Retrospective study where medical records of consecutive patients with chronic respiratory diseases who completed PR from 2016 to 2018 were reviewed. ADL-focused energy-conservation training was added to traditional PR in September 2017 by replacing three monthly sessions of traditional PR with energy-conservation training as a quality-improvement-initiative. The change from baseline on HRQOL measured by COPD assessment test (CAT), six-minute-walk-test, MMRC dyspnea score and CRQ-dyspnea and CRQ-fatigue questionnaires, were compared between patients who received traditional PR versus energy-conservation PR. Within and between group differences were calculated via repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of 91 patients who participated in traditional PR versus energy-conservation PR (n = 85) were similar (mean age = 68.6±10.4 years, 49% men). While improvement from baseline was similar and significant for both groups for MMRC, CRQ-dyspnea and CRQ-fatigue scores, and six-minute walk test, patients who participated in energy-conservation PR had significantly higher improvement in HRQOL CAT scores (p = 0.01) than those who completed traditional PR. CONCLUSION: Tailoring patient''s training programs to include energy-conservation training exercises specific to ADL in PR improved HRQOL over traditional PR in patients with chronic respiratory diseases despite no significant change in functional status. Future randomized-controlled trials will be needed to confirm these initial findings.