Same goal, different perspectives: Stakeholder views on context for connected care technology implementation in an integrated healthcare system.

Robinson SA, Lipschitz JM, Ndiwane N, Bixler FR, Etingen B, Zocchi MS, Shimada SL, Palmer JA, Newton TJ, Shah N, Hogan TP. Same goal, different perspectives: Stakeholder views on context for connected care technology implementation in an integrated healthcare system. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2025 Sep 5; 1357633X251371113, DOI: 10.1177/1357633X251371113.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• CDA 21-187 – Developing an Intervention to Optimize Virtual Care Adoption for COPD Management

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

IntroductionThe Veterans Health Administration (VHA) prioritizes use of connected care technologies to enhance access and outcomes. The context in which connected care is implemented is crucial, yet difficult to measure, due to its subjective and complex nature. This evaluation examined alignment among stakeholder perceptions of context related to connected care implementation across VHA.MethodsA national, cross-sectional survey assessed perceptions of 11 contextual factors relevant to connected care implementation as identified in published reviews within the implementation science literature. Across 142 VHA facilities and 18 regions, surveys were sent to four stakeholder groups: clinical team members, connected care coordinators, facility leadership, and regional leadership. Mean scores for each factor were compared between stakeholder groups using Welch''s ANOVA and Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons.ResultsA total of 5541 respondents (36.1% response rate) participated. Organizational Culture and Climate was rated the most favorable contextual factor (mean? = 3.9, SD? = 0.7), while Financial Resources was perceived as least favorable (mean? = 3.0, SD? = 1.0). Significant differences emerged between the perceptions of frontline workers (clinical team members, connected care coordinators) and leadership (facility, regional). Clinical team members rated nearly all contextual factors less favorably than facility leadership. Coordinators similarly rated most factors less favorably than leadership.DiscussionFindings highlight a misalignment between leadership and frontline workers in their perceptions of organizational context for implementing connected care technologies. Leadership viewed key contextual factors (e.g. Organizational Readiness to Change, Leadership Support) more favorably than frontline workers. This misalignment may impact implementation success, suggesting a need for strategies to better align stakeholder perceptions.