Mapping Interdisciplinary Role Ownership Over Actionable Practices Identified From the Bereaved Family Survey.

Chow JK, McCaa M, Bozkurt S, Gamboa RC, Lorenz KA, Giannitrapani KF. Mapping Interdisciplinary Role Ownership Over Actionable Practices Identified From the Bereaved Family Survey. The American journal of hospice & palliative care. 2025 Jan 30; 10499091251317174, DOI: 10.1177/10499091251317174.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• CDA 19-075 – Building Better Interdisciplinary Pain Teams Across Disciplines

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of mapping interdisciplinary role ownership over actionable practices identified from qualitative comments in the Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey (BFS). METHODS: We polled two providers from each of 14 disciplines as to whether an actionable practice that improved end-of-life care quality sits within their scope of practice. We grouped practices by having the greatest, middle, and fewest number of disciplines that claimed role ownership and then characterized what roles were shared. MAJOR FINDINGS: Medicine, nursing, social work, and occupational therapy claimed role ownership of the greatest number of practices among the 14 disciplines. Chaplaincy and the allied health disciplines had a comparatively more limited range of role ownership of practices. Practices with the greatest number of professionals claiming role ownership were general professional behaviors that do not require specialized training (e.g., being easy to talk to). Practices with the middle number of role ownership required clinical specialization (e.g., offering non-pharmacological interventions to reduce agitation). Practices with the fewest number of disciplines required a narrower skill set (e.g., signing the death certificate in a timely manner) or administrative authority to perform (e.g., providing adequate nursing staff). CONCLUSIONS: This project demonstrated the feasibility of mapping BFS actionable practices across disciplines. A larger sample and rigorous statistical analysis are required for application at a health care system level. Understanding role ownership can then guide efforts relating to role ownership and role sharing for end-of-life quality improvement activities.