The implementation of a pain navigator program in the department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) health care systems: a cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial.

France C, Cook CE, Coffman CJ, Tumminello C, Choate A, George SZ, Lentz TA, Hastings SN. The implementation of a pain navigator program in the department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) health care systems: a cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2024 Nov 1; 25(Supplement_1):S83-S90, DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnae074.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: This manuscript describes the uptake of the AIM-Back Pain Navigator Pathway (PNP) designed to encourage use of non-pharmacologic care options within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). DESIGN: This manuscript describes the implementation of a telehealth intervention from one arm of a multisite, embedded, cluster-randomized pragmatic trial comparing the effectiveness of two novel clinical care pathways that provide access to non-pharmacologic care for Veterans with low back pain (LBP). SETTING: Ten VHA clinics. SUBJECTS: 19 pain navigators, > 200 primary care physicians, and over 1000 Veterans were involved in the PNP implementation. METHODS: Data were generated within the VHA electronic health record (EHR) for the ongoing AIM-Back trial to describe PNP implementation for system-level findings in terms of number of visits, and type of care received. RESULTS: Over a 3-year period, 9 of 10 clinics implemented the PNP within the context of the AIM-Back trial. The most frequent care recommended in the PNP included physical therapy, chiropractic, acupuncture, and yoga/tai chi. During follow-up at six-weeks, 50% of Veterans elected to receive a different care choice than what was initially prescribed. Notable variation across clinics was documented for PNP based on time to initiation of care and follow-up rates. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the telehealth delivered PNP provides a nuanced understanding of the introduction of novel care programs within diverse clinical settings. These findings are most applicable to care programs that are delivered remotely and involve facilitation of existing care options.