A Qualitative Assessment of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Experiences for Women Veterans in VHA Care.

Mog AC, Young JP, Mamkhezri JH, Merkel C, Gray KE. A Qualitative Assessment of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Experiences for Women Veterans in VHA Care. Journal of general internal medicine. 2025 Aug 1; 40(11):2563-2572, DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09645-w.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Nearly 25% of women experience pelvic floor disorders, for which pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is a first-line treatment. Within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), only one-third of health care systems offer PFPT on site. Alternatives include receiving care from providers in the community ("Community Care") or from VHA providers at a distant site via telehealth ("Clinical Resource Hub"). Little is known about Veterans'' experiences with these two PFPT care pathways. OBJECTIVE: To characterize women Veterans'' experiences with PFPT, including factors affecting access to and receipt of care. DESIGN: Using VHA data, we recruited and conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with women Veterans who had received PFPT services within the last 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited N? = 20 women Veterans from five VHA health care systems. Participants from four health care systems went through the Community Care pathway (N? = 12), while participants from the fifth went through the Clinical Resource Hub (N? = 8). APPROACH: We recorded and auto-transcribed semi-structured interviews. Using structured interview summaries, we completed a two-step analysis process, first using rapid, team-based matrix analysis, followed by thematic analysis. We identified key themes and domains into which we organized those themes. KEY RESULTS: We identified themes in three domains: barriers getting care, experiences of care, and barriers extending care. Veterans described barriers to receiving care initially, including a lack of knowledge, stigma, providers dismissing concerns, and referral challenges. Participants were generally satisfied with their care and experienced quality of life improvements. Most desired some in-person care. Patients wanting more care after completing initially approved visits faced additional administrative barriers, leading to symptom recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Findings about patient access barriers suggest provider training and education (including awareness of PFPT''s clinical benefits, referral pathways, and trauma-informed care), patient education, hybrid care modalities, expansion of the PFPT provider workforce, and streamlining referrals may improve access to PFPT among Veterans.