Sex differences in proteomics of cardiovascular disease - Results from the Yale-CMD registry.

Liu Y, Wang Z, Collins SP, Testani J, Safdar B. Sex differences in proteomics of cardiovascular disease - Results from the Yale-CMD registry. International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature. 2025 Jun 1; 58:101667, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101667.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

Aims This study assessed sex-specific proteomic profiles by cardiovascular disease (CVD) phenotype (coronary artery disease [CAD] vs coronary microvascular dysfunction [CMD]) and describe their role in sex-specific pathways. METHODS: In a secondary biobank analysis of the Yale-CMD registry, adults with ischemic symptoms who underwent cardiac positron emission test/computed tomography were categorized as a) controls (normal coronary flow reserve (CFR)  >  2 without perfusion defect or coronary calcification), b) having CMD (CFR  <  2 without defect or calcification), or c) having CAD (known CAD or new perfusion defect). Using proximity extension assays (Olink® Explore 3072), we examined 2944 proteins. Differential protein expression was assessed using linear regression models, adjusting for age, race, body mass index, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, or smoking. RESULTS: Of 190 patients, 91 provided blood samples (mean age, 56 years; 66 %, females; 48 %, controls; 24 %, CAD; 27 %, CMD). Among controls, 15 proteins showed sex differences (5 proteins upregulated in females, 10 in males; false discovery rate [FDR < 0.05]). Upregulated in CAD patients were FSHB in females and INSL3 and EDDM3B in males (FDR < 0.05). Among CMD patients, SCGB3A1 and HGFAC were higher in females; INSL3, SPINT3, EDDM3B, and KLK3 were higher in males (FDR < 0.05). Per pathway analysis, females showed upregulation of immune pathways in CAD and lipid and glucose metabolism pathways in CMD. Males showed upregulated endothelial regulation of blood flow in CAD and increased angiogenesis in CMD. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences exist in the proteomic profiles of CAD and CMD patients, highlighting a need for precision medicine.