Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Co-Designing Meaningful Extended Reality for Physical Rehabilitation: A Stakeholder-Driven Approach to Embodied Telehealth

Elor A, Parrales A, Bourdon SM, Kuznetsov M, Callwood K, Tu A, Powell M, Robbins A, Bundle M, Skelton F, Touchett H. Co-Designing Meaningful Extended Reality for Physical Rehabilitation: A Stakeholder-Driven Approach to Embodied Telehealth. Frontiers in Virtual Reality. 2026 Jan 28; 6:1675309.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

Introduction: Extended Reality (XR) technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to redefine physical rehabilitation experiences through embodied telepresence and full-body motion tracking. Realizing meaningful XR in physical rehabilitation requires stakeholder input addressing remote embodied therapy's unique design challenges. Methods: This study presents one of the first stakeholder co-design workshops on embodied telehealth for physical rehabilitation, engaging participants [N = 24 total including ten clinicians, eight patients, three designers, and three engineers] across five focus groups with stakeholders from clinical, academic, and industry settings. Through structured usability testing and a four-axis framework analysis, we evaluated immersive Virtual Reality (VR) applications supporting synchronous clinician-led embodied appointments and asynchronous clinician-authored patient home exercise programs with full-body tracked avatars and biomechanical assessments. Results: Stakeholder feedback reinforced the need for embodied agency with adaptive input modalities for diverse patient needs, ensuring clinical authenticity through real-time full-body tracking for accurate movement correction and scaling interaction complexity from minimal interfaces for VR novices (78% of participants) to customizable clinical dashboards. Crossstakeholder prioritization identified minimalist XR interface navigation (19 votes) and flexible clinical assessment capabilities (17 votes) as the highest-priority design requirements, while exit surveys suggested high patient comfort (M = 4.50/5) and strong clinician adoption interest (M = 4.14/5). Discussion: We propose six design principles for meaningful XR telehealth in physical rehabilitation: 1) embodied guidance with real-time feedback, 2) progressive complexity with minimalist defaults, 3) adaptive accessibility through multi-modal input, 4) clinical authenticity via domain-specific assessments, 5) biomechanical precision for trust and safety, and 6) contextual onboarding to improve therapeutic competency. These findings offer design considerations for developing embodied XR telehealth systems that support sustained therapeutic engagement and meaningful rehabilitation outcomes. KEYWORDS accessibility, co-design, embodied telehealth, extended reality, immersive virtual reality, physical therapy, physical rehabilitation, user-centered design





Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.
<--- --->