Further validation of the alcohol dependence scale as an index of severity.

Saxon AJ, Kivlahan DR, Doyle S, Donovan DM. Further validation of the alcohol dependence scale as an index of severity. Journal of Studies On Alcohol. 2007 Jan 1; 68(1):149-56.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: The Alcohol Dependence Scale (ADS) yields continuous scores purported to reflect the severity of the dependence syndrome. We evaluated the concurrent validity of the ADS as a general measure of severity and the screening accuracy of the total score and subscales to detect Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), physiological dependence. METHOD: Treatment-seeking, alcohol-dependent individuals entering the Combining Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence (COMBINE) Study (N = 1,372; 69% men) completed the ADS, diagnostic interviews, and other measures before randomization. Analyses of variance tested differences between ADS quartiles on alcohol- related measures. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve assessed screening accuracy for DSM-IV physiological dependence (tolerance or withdrawal) or withdrawal alone. RESULTS: ADS quartiles differed on age, other demographics, and prior treatment episodes. Linear correlation showed moderate to large magnitude associations with alcohol-related self-report measures and most indices of consumption. ADS quartiles differed significantly on proportion with DSM-IV physiological dependence, but AUROC curves indicated that the ADS had limited accuracy as a continuous measure to detect DSMIV physiological dependence (AUROC = .75 [95% confidence interval {CI}: .70-.79] and .67 [95% CI: .60-.74] for men and women, respectively; p = .08) or withdrawal alone (AUROC = .77 [95% CI: .74-.80] and .74 [95% CI: .69-.79] for men and women, respectively; p = .30). Screening accuracy was comparably limited based on ADS subscales reflecting psychoperceptual or psychophysical withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: The ADS reflected variation in symptom severity but did not adequately identify physiological dependence or withdrawal in treatment-seeking individuals with DSM-IV alcohol dependence.