A novel interdisciplinary analgesic program reduces pain and improves function in older adults after orthopedic surgery.

Morrison RS, Flanagan S, Fischberg D, Cintron A, Siu AL. A novel interdisciplinary analgesic program reduces pain and improves function in older adults after orthopedic surgery. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2009 Jan 1; 57(1):1-10.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of a multicomponent intervention on pain and function after orthopedic surgery. DESIGN: Controlled prospective propensity score-matched clinical trial. SETTING: New York City acute rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-nine patients admitted to rehabilitation after hip fracture repair (n = 51) or hip (n = 64) or knee (n = 134) arthroplasty. INTERVENTION: Pain assessment at rest and with physical therapy (PT) by staff using numeric rating scales (1 to 5). Physician protocols for standing analgesia and preemptive analgesia before PT were implemented on the intervention unit. Control unit patients received usual care. MEASUREMENTS: Pain, analgesic prescribing, gait speed, transfer time, and percentage of PT sessions completed during admission. Pain and difficulty walking at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks after discharge. RESULTS: In multivariable analyses intervention patients were significantly more likely than controls to report no or mild pain at rest (66% vs 49%, P = .004) and with PT (52% vs 38%, P = .02) on average for the first 7 days of rehabilitation, had faster 8-foot-walk times on Days 4 (9.3 seconds vs 13.2 seconds, P = .02) and 7 (6.9 vs 9.2 seconds, P = .02), received more analgesia (23.6 vs 15.6 mg of morphine sulfate equivalents per day, P < .001), were more likely to receive standing orders for analgesia (98% vs 48%, P < .001), and had significantly shorter lengths of stay (10.1 vs 11.3 days, P = .005). At 6 months, intervention patients were less likely than controls to report moderate to severe pain with walking (4% vs 15%, P = .02) and that pain did not interfere with walking (7% vs 18%, P = .004) and were less likely to be taking analgesics (35% vs 51%, P = .03). CONCLUSION: The intervention improved postoperative pain, reduced chronic pain, and improved function.