United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Evidence-based Synthesis Program

The Evidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) was established to provide timely and accurate syntheses of targeted health care topics of particular importance to VA managers and policy makers and to disseminate these reports broadly throughout VA. Available reports are listed and linked below.

Determining the Efficacy of Psychotherapy for Treatment Resistant Depression  (October 2009)

Evidence Synthesis for Determining the Efficacy of Psychotherapy for Treatment Resistant Depression

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent disorder impacting an estimated 13% of the general population, and a third of the veteran population. Antidepressant medications are the most commonly prescribed treatment modality for MDD and are often the first line of treatment in primary care settings. However, fewer than 50% of patients fully remit after adequate dosage of antidepressant treatment. Treatment options for these "treatment resistant" patients vary but typically involve using other psychoactive medications as augmentation (i.e., addition of another medication) or substitution treatment (i.e., switching medications). Less attention has been paid to using psychotherapy as an augmentation or substitution treatment for treatment resistant patients, despite psychotherapy being associated with clinical improvements in MDD comparable to those achieved with antidepressants. The current review will address the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic approaches as a second step treatment for MDD in patients who do not achieve remission after initial treatment with antidepressants.

The systematic literature review addressed the following key question:

In primary care patients with major depressive disorder who do not achieve remission with acute phase antidepressant treatment, is empirically based psychotherapy used as an augmentation or substitution treatment more effective than control for achieving remission?


Determining the Efficacy of Psychotherapy for Treatment Resistant Depression (1 MB, PDF)

Determining the Responsiveness of Depression Questionnaires and Optimal Treatment Duration for Antidepressant Medications  (October 2009)

Evidence Synthesis for Determining the Responsiveness of Depression Questionnaires and Optimal Treatment Duration for Antidepressant Medications

According to projections from the World Health Organization, depression will be the second leading cause of disability in the developed world by 2020. Primary care clinicians care for approximately two thirds of depressed individuals. A variety of strategies have been tested to improve patient outcomes, with integrated care models having emerged as both clinically-and cost-effective. Patients randomized to integrated care are more likely to receive an adequate trial of antidepressants and/or empirically based psychotherapies and are approximately twice as likely to respond to treatment compared to usual care.

To inform recommendations for clinical guidelines and potential performance measures, this evidence synthesis evaluates the responsiveness of depression questionnaires feasible for primary care settings and data from randomized trials that examine the effects on continued antidepressant use to prevent relapse or recurrence.

The systematic literature review addressed the following key questions:

  1. In patients with major depressive disorder treated in primary care settings, what assessment tools are responsive to change?
  2. In primary care patients with major depressive disorder who remit with antidepressant medication, what is the minimum treatment duration to decrease the risk of relapse or recurrence?
Determining the Responsiveness of Depression Questionnaires and Optimal Treatment Duration for Antidepressant Medications (1.2 MB, PDF)

Assessment and Treatment of Individuals with History of TBI and PTSD  (August 2009)

Assessment and Treatment of Individuals with History of TBI and PTSD

VA and Department of Defense (DoD) healthcare facilities are increasingly serving a large population of OEF/OIF veterans who have sustained traumatic brain injury (TBI), suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or have both a history of TBI and current PTSD. Mild TBI (mTBI) is considered the most common form of TBI. Uncertainty exists regarding the long-term health outcomes of mTBI as well as the validity of criteria used to assess for a history of this injury. Current evidence-based practices to screen, diagnose, prospectively evaluate, and treat mTBI symptoms or PTSD may be less accurate or effective when these conditions co-occur. Thus, there is a need to develop an evidence base to identify best practices to define, diagnose, evaluate, and manage patients with mTBI/PTSD, particularly in U.S. veterans of OEF/OIF.

The systematic literature review addressed the following key questions:

  1. What is the prevalence of comorbid TBI and PTSD? Does the reported prevalence vary by study population, trauma etiology, TBI severity (mild versus moderate and severe), or methods of case ascertainment?
    1. What is the prevalence of comorbid TBI and PTSD? Does the reported prevalence vary by study population, trauma etiology, TBI severity (mild versus moderate and severe), or methods of case ascertainment?
    2. What is the relative accuracy of diagnostic tests used for assessing PTSD when PTSD is comorbid with mTBI?
    1. Are there psychosocial or pharmacological therapies used for treatment of mTBI and PTSD simultaneously?
    2. Are therapies for treatment of mTBI effective when mTBI is comorbid with PTSD? Is there evidence of harms?
    3. Are therapies for treatment of PTSD effective when PTSD is comorbid with mTBI? Is there evidence of harms?
Assessment and Treatment of Individuals with History of TBI and PTSD (1.4 MB, PDF)

Determining Key Features of Effective Depression Interventions  (March 2009)

Determining Key Features of  Effective Depression Interventions

Current clinical guidelines for depression address depression treatment for patients detected in primary care and NICE guidelines. Research to date indicates that, under usual care conditions, less than half of primary care patients found to have major depression complete minimally adequate medications or psychotherapy. A variety of organizational changes aimed at improving care for depression in primary care have been tested. Yet evidence-based guidance for healthcare organizations and their primary care practices about which organizational changes are necessary for achieving improved depression outcomes is lacking. The purpose of this review is to establish a basis for organizational guidelines or best practices for achieving improved depression care.

The key questions addressed were:

  1. What is the core set of intervention features that characterize collaborative care interventions, and which additional features are most linked to enhanced outcome effects?
  2. Are there specific evaluation features among randomized trials of collaborative care that are associated with effect size differences, independently of intervention features?
  3. To what extent is collaborative care more effective than usual care for decreasing depressive symptoms among patients with comorbid mental health conditions (PTSD, dementia, anxiety, dysthymia, substance abuse) or medical conditions?
Determining Key Features of Effective Depression Interventions (1.2 MB, PDF)

Strategies for Suicide Prevention in Veterans  (January 2009)

Strategies for Suicide Prevention in Veterans

Suicide is a devastating outcome of major public health importance. Suicide rates for patients abusing alcohol and other substances, or suffering from other mental health conditions may be elevated. Because suicide prevention is a priority of the Veterans Health Administration, the VA wishes to expand and enhance use of evidence-based prevention or reduction methods.

The key questions addressed were:

  1. What are the new or improved suicide prevention strategies (e.g. hotlines, outreach programs, peer counseling, treatment coordination programs, and new counseling approaches) that show promise for Veterans?
  2. What solid evidence base supports the most promising strategies?
  3. What evidence is still needed to establish various strategies as the most promising (framed as research questions to guide and focus continued research to expand knowledge regarding the effectiveness of suicide prevention approaches)?
Strategies for Suicide Prevention in Veterans (1.6 MB, PDF)

Management of Inpatient Hyperglycemia: A Systematic Review  (October 2008)

Management of Inpatient Hyperglycemia:  A Systematic Review

Hyperglycemia is a common finding in hospitalized patients and has been associated with worsened outcomes in a variety of inpatient subpopulations. The use of insulin to control blood glucose has been advocated as a way to improve health outcomes in hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia, but the evidence for the efficacy of this approach and the thresholds for initiating insulin management are unclear.

The key questions were:

  1. Does strict blood glucose control compared to less strict blood glucose control improve final health outcomes in the following patients?
    • patients in the medical intensive care unit
    • patients in the surgical intensive care unit
    • acute myocardial infarction patients
    • acute stroke patients
    • post coronary artery bypass graft patients
    • general surgical ward patients
    • general medicine ward patients
  2. What are the harms of strict blood glucose control in the above subpopulations?
  3. What are the most effective and safest means of normalizing blood glucose in the above subpopulations?

Management of Inpatient Hyperglycemia: A Systematic Review (749 KB, PDF)
    - Appendix D (87 KB, MS Excel)
    - Appendix E (81 KB, MS Excel)

Pain in Patients with Polytrauma: A Systematic Review  (September 2008)

Pain in Patients with Polytrauma:  A Systematic Review

Pain resulting from polytraumatic injuries poses numerous challenges during and after rehabilitation treatment. The objectives of this report are to systematically review the literature to address the assessment and management of pain in patients with polytraumatic injuries, to identify patient, clinician and systems factors associated with pain-related outcomes in these patients, and to describe current or planned research addressing the key questions in this report. The key questions were:

  1. Have reliable and valid measures and assessment tools been developed to measure pain intensity and pain-related functional interference among patients with cognitive deficits due to TBI? Which measures and tools are likely to be most useful in assessing pain in polytrauma patients with cognitive deficits due to TBI?
  2. What patient factors are associated with better and worse pain-related clinical outcomes among polytrauma patients? Have interventions been developed to specifically address these factors?
  3. What are unique provider and system barriers to detecting and treating pain among polytrauma patients? Have interventions been developed to effectively address these barriers?

Pain in Patients with Polytrauma: A Systematic Review (770 KB, PDF)
    - Appendix D - Reviewer comments and responses (91 KB, MS Excel)
    - Appendix E - Evidence Table 1 - Studies on patient factors associated with polytrauma outcomes (132 KB, MS Excel)
    - Appendix E - Evidence Table 2 - Active research projects (60 KB, MS Excel)

Assessment and Management of Acute Pain in Adult Medical Inpatients: A Systematic Review  (April 2008)

Pain in Patients with Polytrauma:  A Systematic Review

The prevalence of pain on the inpatient medical ward is lower than that of a surgical service, but is still substantial. A systematic review was conducted, including an integration of the existing literature on the delivery of effective pain care in the acute care setting, to inform the VA's National Pain Management Strategy and the VA's pain research agenda. The key questions addressed were:

  1. For inpatients who have acute pain, how do differences in timing and frequency of assessment, severity of pain, and follow-up of pain affect choice of treatment, clinical outcomes, and safety?
  2. How do the timing and route of administration of pain interventions compare in effectiveness, adverse effects, and safety in these inpatient care settings?
  3. For inpatients with impaired self-report due to any of several factors, including delirium or confusion, pre-existing severe dementia, closed head injury, stroke, and psychosis, how do differences in assessment and management of acute pain affect clinical outcomes or safety?
  4. For inpatients with dependencies on tobacco, alcohol, stimulant, marijuana, or opioids, how do differences in assessment and management of acute pain affect clinical outcomes or safety? How do the assessment and management of acute pain differ between patients on prexisting opioid therapy and patients with opiate addiction?

Assessment and Management of Acute Pain in Adult Medical Inpatients: A Systematic Review (759 KB, PDF)
    - Appendices A, B, C, and E (153 KB, PDF)
    - Appendix D - Evidence Summary Tables (44 KB, MS Excel)

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Meta Analysis of Effectiveness  (September 2007)

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Meta Analysis of Effectiveness

Diabetes is a prevalent and costly disease in Veterans. Control of blood glucose is an important VA objective. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is advocated as a method to better achieve control. The Key Questions investigated in this report were:

  1. Is regular SMBG effective in either achieving or maintaining target A1c levels for patients with type 2 diabetes?
  2. Does regular SMBG reduce the frequency of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes?
  3. Is there evidence that different frequencies of testing result in differences in improvements in A1c?

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Meta Analysis of Effectiveness (680 KB, PDF)

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the VA Healthcare System  (June 2007)

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the VA Healthcare System: A Systematic Review

Numerous studies have demonstrated racial and ethnic disparities in health care in the United States. These disparities have been demonstrated in the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system, where financial barriers to receiving care are minimized. The VA is committed to delivering high-quality care in an equitable manner, and as such, to eliminating racial and ethnic disparities in health care. To inform this effort, the existing evidence on disparities within the VA was systematically reviewed, to address the following objectives:

  1. Determine in which clinical areas racial and ethnic disparities are prevalent within the VA;
  2. Describe what is known about the sources of those disparities; and
  3. Qualitatively synthesize that knowledge to determine the most promising avenues for future research aimed at improving equity in VA health care.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the VA Healthcare System: A Systematic Review (868 KB, PDF)
    - Appendix IV - Evidence Tables (535 KB, MS Excel)

Screening Men for Osteoporosis  (May 2007)

Screening Men for Osteoporosis: Who & How

Although 25% of men over the age of 60 will sustain osteoporotic fractures during their lifetime, data suggest that male osteoporosis is underdiganosed and undertreated. In order to help inform decisions about whether the Veterans Health Administration should develop screening guidelines for male osteoporosis, the following Key Questions were analysed in this report:

  1. What are the prevalence of and risk factors for osteopenia, osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures among men in general and among male Veterans specifically?
  2. Are there any validated tools (outside of central bone density) to screen for osteoporosis in men?
  3. What values of bone mineral density (BMD) determined by Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) (and by different DXA techniques) have been used to diagnose osteopenia and osteoporosis; and what is the evidence regarding the relationship between differing definitions and the development of osteoporotic fractures?

Screening Men for Osteoporosis: Who & How (800 KB, PDF)

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Management  (February 2007)

BPH Management in Primary Care – Screening and Therapy

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) causes urinary hesitancy and intermittency, weak urine stream, nocturia, frequency, urgency, and the sensation of incomplete bladder emptying. These symptoms, collectively called "lower urinary tract symptoms," or LUTS, can significantly reduce quality of life. Depending upon the severity of sypmtoms, men may be managed without pharmacotherapy, or they may require medical treatments of drugs from two main classes. This Evidence Synthesis Report addresses the following questions about treatment for BPH:

  1. For patients with BPH, what are the comparative benefits, harms, and efficacy of combination therapy with a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor plus an alpha blocker, versus either treatment alone?
  2. What are the comparative efficacy and harms of alpha-1-adrenergic antagonists?
  3. Are there subgroups of patients based on demographics (age, racial groups), other medications, or co-morbidities for which one treatment is more effective or associated with fewer adverse events?

BPH Management in Primary Care – Screening and Therapy (1 MB, PDF)