A Longitudinal Assessment of the Effect of Resident-Centered Care on Quality in Veterans Health Administration Community Living Centers.

Sullivan JL, Shwartz M, Stolzmann K, Afable MK, Burgess JF. A Longitudinal Assessment of the Effect of Resident-Centered Care on Quality in Veterans Health Administration Community Living Centers. Health services research. 2018 Jun 1; 53(3):1819-1833.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• IIR 11-356 – Examining the Relationship of Culture Change, Adverse Events and Costs in CLCs

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether changes in resident-centered care (RCC) over time were associated with changes in quality. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data sources were the Minimum Dataset quality indicators (which consist of measures of both prevalence and incidence of adverse events) and the Artifacts of Culture Change Tool (which measures RCC; FYs 2009-2012) from 130 Veterans Health Administration community living centers. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective longitudinal study. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were from VA secondary data sources. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The overall relationship between RCC and quality was not statistically significant (p  =  .22), although there was a weakly significant negative relationship (i.e., increased RCC was associated with poorer quality) in the seven quarters after implementation of an automated version of the Artifacts Tool (p  =  .08). In facility-specific analyses, there were 15 facilities with a weakly significant (p  <  .10) positive relationship between RCC and quality and 21 with a weakly significant negative relationship. Adjusted cost per patient day was over 50 percent higher in the 21 facilities with a negative relationship than in the 15 facilities with a positive relationship (p  <  .05). CONCLUSIONS: The Artifacts score is a formal performance metric in the VA, and thus, facilities were explicitly incentivized to increase RCC. Using qualitative methods to identify characteristics that distinguished those facilities able to increase both RCC and quality from those that suffered declines in quality as RCC was improved is an important follow-up to this study.