National Survey of the Bone Densitometry Evaluation Process Within an Integrated Healthcare System.

Steffen MJA, McCoy KD, Mengeling MA, Miller KL, Davila H, Wardyn SE, Shibli-Rahhal A, Farukhi I, Solimeo SL. National Survey of the Bone Densitometry Evaluation Process Within an Integrated Healthcare System. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2023 Dec 6; 27(1):101459.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: To assess the current state of bone mineral density evaluation services via dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provided to Veterans with fracture risk through the development and administration of a nationwide survey of facilities in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODOLOGY: The Bone Densitometry Survey was developed by convening a Work Group of individuals with expertise in bone densitometry and engaging the Work Group in an iterative drafting and revision process. Once completed, the survey was beta tested, administered through REDCap, and sent via e-mail to points of contact at 178 VHA facilities. RESULTS: Facility response rate was 31?% (56/178). Most DXA centers reported positively to markers of readiness for their bone densitometers: less than 10 years old (n = 35; 63?%); in "excellent" or "good" condition (n = 44; 78?%, 32?% and 46?%, respectively); and perform phantom calibration (n = 43; 77?%). Forty-one DXA centers (73?%) use intake processes that have been shown to reduce errors. Thirty-seven DXA centers (66?%) reported their technologists receive specialized training in DXA, while 14 (25?%) indicated they receive accredited training. Seventeen DXA centers (30?%) reported performing routine precision assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Many DXA centers reported using practices that meet minimal standards for DXA reporting and preparation; however, the lack of standardization, even within an integrated healthcare system, indicates an opportunity for quality improvement to ensure consistent high quality bone mineral density evaluation of Veterans.