Health Services Research & Development

Veterans Crisis Line Badge
Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

ESP Report: Comparative Clinical and Economic Effectiveness of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents

Click for list of published reports
Click for topic nomination form
Click for list of reports in progress

Subscribe to the
ESP Report RSS feed RSS feed icon
Comparative Clinical and Economic Effectiveness of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents

Principal Investigator: Allison Low, BA
Contributing Investigators: Devan Kansagara, MD, MCR; Michele Freeman, MPH; Rochelle Fu, PhD; Kavita Bhavsar, MD; Ambar Faridi, MD; Karli Kondo, PhD; Robin Paynter, MLIS



Evidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) Center, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR

Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs; January 2017.

Download PDF: Complete Report, Executive Summary, Report, Appendices


Introduction

Visual impairment is a common problem among Veterans and results in significant reduction in quality of life. Diseases commonly responsible for substantial losses in visual acuity include neovascular ("wet") age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and central or branch retinal vein occlusion (CRVO or BRVO). While the etiologies of these diseases are complex, all are driven at least in part by vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs). This has led to the development of several drugs called anti-VEGF agents designed to block these factors and thus limit their damage to the eye. The most commonly used anti-VEGF agents—aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab—have been shown to slow and even reverse the vision loss typically seen in patients with AMD, DME, BRVO, and CRVO. The comparative effectiveness, harms, and costs of these drugs are unclear.

This topic was nominated by Dr. Glenn Cockerham, National Program Director for VHA Ophthalmology Services. The scope and key questions of this report were determined during a topic refinement process that included a preliminary review of published peer-reviewed literature, discussion with internal partners and investigators, and consultation with content experts and key stakeholders. This review follows established systematic review methodology and a protocol describing the review plan was posted to the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews website before the review was initiated. The key research questions for this review are as follows:

Key Questions


Key Question 1: What is the comparative clinical effectiveness of anti-VEGF agents for retinal/choroidal neovascularization and/or macular edema in adults?

Key Question 2: What are the comparative harms of anti-VEGF agents for retinal/choroidal neovascularization and/or macular edema in adults?

Key Question 3: What is the comparative cost-effectiveness of anti-VEGF

See also

Comparative Effectiveness of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents (Management eBrief)

Comparative Clinical and Economic Effectiveness of Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents (Cyberseminar)