Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

Health Services Research & Development

Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Adherence to guidelines for ESRD anemia management.

Hynes DM, Stroupe KT, Kaufman JS, Reda DJ, Peterman A, Browning MM, Huo Z, Sorbara D. Adherence to guidelines for ESRD anemia management. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2006 Mar 1; 47(3):455-61.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

BACKGROUND: A costly component of end-stage renal disease care is anemia management with recombinant human erythropoietin. National Kidney Foundation clinical practice guidelines recommend that erythropoietin be administered subcutaneously, rather than intravenously, given that the target hemoglobin level can be maintained with a lower subcutaneous dose. Because reimbursement for erythropoietin differs for federal versus private-sector dialysis centers, we hypothesized different use patterns by facility type. METHODS: Using data from a multisite prospective observational study of hemodialysis patients from 2001 to 2003, we examined compliance with erythropoietin administration guidelines across Veterans Affairs (VA) versus private-sector facilities and implications for erythropoietin dose, anemia management, and cost. RESULTS: Erythropoietin was administered predominantly subcutaneously for 52% of patients in VA versus 15% in private-sector facilities (P < 0.0001). Average adjusted weekly subcutaneous erythropoietin doses were 13,710 and 13,362 units at VA and private-sector facilities versus 19,453 and 21,237 units for intravenous erythropoietin (P = 0.01), with corresponding hemoglobin levels of 11.55 and 12.34 g/dL (115.5 and 123.4 g/L) for subcutaneous and 11.38 and 11.91 g/dL (113.8 and 119.1 g/L) for intravenous erythropoietin (P = 0.0002), respectively. Yearly erythropoietin costs per patient for subcutaneous administration were $7,129 and $6,948 at VA and private-sector facilities versus $10,116 and $11,043 for intravenous administration (P = 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: We found greater guideline adherence at VA facilities compared with the private sector, with lower erythropoietin costs, although overall adherence is low. Anemia management was similar. Future research should examine how patient preferences and financial incentives impact on the wider use of subcutaneous erythropoietin administration.





Questions about the HSR&D website? Email the Web Team.

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.