Health Services Research & Development

Veterans Crisis Line Badge
Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstracts

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Radomski TR, Zhao X, Hanlon JT, Thorpe JM, Thorpe CT, Naples JG, Sileanu FE, Cashy JP, Hale JA, Mor MK, Hausmann LRM, Donohue JM, Suda KJ, Stroupe KT, Good CB, Fine MJ, Gellad WF. Use of a medication-based risk adjustment index to predict mortality among veterans dually-enrolled in VA and medicare. Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2019 Apr 25.
PubMed logo Search for Abstract from PubMed
(This link leaves the website of VA HSR&D.)


Abstract: BACKGROUND: There is systemic undercoding of medical comorbidities within administrative claims in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This leads to bias when applying claims-based risk adjustment indices to compare outcomes between VA and non-VA settings. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of a medication-based risk adjustment index (RxRisk-VM) to diagnostic claims-based indices for predicting mortality. METHODS: We modified the RxRisk-V index (RxRisk-VM) by incorporating VA and Medicare pharmacy and durable medical equipment claims in Veterans dually-enrolled in VA and Medicare in 2012. Using the concordance (C) statistic, we compared its accuracy in predicting 1 and 3-year all-cause mortality to the following models: demographics only, demographics plus prescription count, or demographics plus a diagnostic claims-based risk index (e.g., Charlson, Elixhauser, or Gagne). We also compared models containing demographics, RxRisk-VM, and a claims-based index. RESULTS: In our cohort of 271,184 dually-enrolled Veterans (mean age?=?70.5 years, 96.1% male, 81.7% non-Hispanic white), RxRisk-VM (C?=?0.773) exhibited greater accuracy in predicting 1-year mortality than demographics only (C?=?0.716) or prescription counts (C?=?0.744), but was less accurate than the Charlson (C?=?0.794), Elixhauser (C?=?0.80), or Gagne (C?=?0.810) indices (all P?