Continuing education for systematic reviews: a prospective longitudinal assessment of a workshop for librarians.

Folb BL, Klem ML, Youk AO, Dahm JJ, He M, Ketchum AM, Wessel CB, Hartman LM. Continuing education for systematic reviews: a prospective longitudinal assessment of a workshop for librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA. 2020 Jan 1; 108(1):36-46.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

Objective: This prospective, longitudinal study explored the impact of a continuing education class on librarians'' knowledge levels about and professional involvement with systematic reviews. Barriers to systematic review participation and the presence of formal systematic review services in libraries were also measured. Methods: Participants completed web-based surveys at three points in time: pre-class, post-class, and six-months'' follow-up. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics and survey questions. Linear mixed effects models assessed knowledge score changes over time. Results: Of 160 class attendees, 140 (88%) completed the pre-class survey. Of those 140, 123 (88%) completed the post-class survey, and 103 (74%) completed the follow-up survey. There was a significant increase ( < 0.00001) from pre-class to post-class in knowledge test scores, and this increase was maintained at follow-up. At post-class, 69% or more of participants intended to promote peer review of searches, seek peer review of their searches, search for grey literature, read or follow published guidelines on conduct and documentation of systematic reviews, and ask for authorship on a systematic review. Among librarians who completed a systematic review between post-class and follow-up, 73% consulted published guidelines, 52% searched grey literature, 48% sought peer review, 57% asked for authorship, and 70% received authorship. Conclusions: Attendance at this continuing education class was associated with positive changes in knowledge about systematic reviews and in librarians'' systematic review-related professional practices. This suggests that in-depth professional development classes can help librarians develop skills that are needed to meet library patrons'' changing service needs.