The prognostic value of diastolic and systolic mechanical left ventricular dyssynchrony among patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure.

Fudim M, Fathallah M, Shaw LK, James O, Samad Z, Piccini JP, Hess PL, Borges-Neto S. The prognostic value of diastolic and systolic mechanical left ventricular dyssynchrony among patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology : Official Publication of The American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. 2020 Oct 1; 27(5):1622-1632.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• CDA 17-164 – Designing for Implementation and Dissemination of High-Value Heart Failure Transitional Care

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Prevalence and prognostic value of diastolic and systolic dyssynchrony in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD)?+?heart failure (HF) or CAD alone are not well understood. METHODS: We included patients with gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) between 2003 and 2009. Patients had at least one major epicardial obstruction? = 50%. We assessed the association between dyssynchrony and outcomes, including all-cause and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Of the 1294 patients, HF was present in 25%. Median follow-up was 6.7 years (IQR 4.9-9.3) years with 537 recorded deaths. Patients with CAD?+?HF had a higher incidence of dyssynchrony than patients with CAD alone (diastolic BW 28.8% for the HF?+?CAD vs 14.7% for the CAD alone). Patients with CAD?+?HF had a lower survival than CAD alone at 10 years (33%; 95% CI 27-40 vs 59; 95% CI 55-62, P? < 0.0001). With one exception, HF was found to have no statistically significant interaction with dyssynchrony measures in unadjusted and adjusted survival models. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CAD?+?HF have a high prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony as measured by GSPECT MPI, and a higher mortality than CAD alone. However, clinical outcomes associated with mechanical dyssynchrony did not differ in patients with and without HF.