Coordination of hemiparetic locomotion after stroke rehabilitation.

Kautz SA, Duncan PW, Perera S, Neptune RR, Studenski SA. Coordination of hemiparetic locomotion after stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2005 Sep 1; 19(3):250-8.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: Determine whether a rehabilitation program targeting functional motor recovery of persons with poststroke hemiparesis improved motor coordination. METHODS: A subgroup of 20 persons with poststroke hemiparesis (n = 11 in intervention and n = 9 in control group) was investigated from within a larger randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial of 100 patients. Motor coordination was measured using a pedaling task, and subjects in the intervention group pedaled during an intensive broad-based home exercise program that targeted flexibility, strength, balance, and endurance. Coordination variables based on paretic leg pedal forces and EMG of 4 thigh muscles were measured while pedaling pre- and postintervention. RESULTS: Despite extensive pedaling practice, up to 30 half-hour sessions that were progressively more intense, there was no effect (P > 0.05) of the intervention on percent of total work done by the paretic leg, quantitative measures of EMG, or pedaling speed. However, walking speed was improved and pedaling and walking faster were associated after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of improved locomotor coordination postintervention. The increased walking and pedaling speed was likely achieved by a more proficient use of the same impaired pattern without EMG timing changes, likely because of increased strength and endurance postintervention. A more task-specific intervention may be required to improve coordination, consistent with principles of use-dependent plasticity.