Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Comparing recruitment strategies for a digital smoking cessation intervention: Technology-assisted peer recruitment, social media, ResearchMatch, and smokefree.gov.

Faro JM, Nagawa CS, Orvek EA, Smith BM, Blok AC, Houston TK, Kamberi A, Allison JJ, Person SD, Sadasivam RS. Comparing recruitment strategies for a digital smoking cessation intervention: Technology-assisted peer recruitment, social media, ResearchMatch, and smokefree.gov. Contemporary clinical trials. 2021 Apr 1; 103:106314.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Choosing the right recruitment strategy has implications for the successful conduct of a trial. Our objective was to compare a novel peer recruitment strategy to four other recruitment strategies for a large randomized trial testing a digital tobacco intervention. METHODS: We compared enrollment rates, demographic and baseline smoking characteristics, and odds of completing the 6-month study by recruitment strategy. Cost of recruitment strategies per retained participant was calculated using staff personnel time and advertisement costs. FINDINGS: We enrolled 1487 participants between August 2017 and March 2019 from: Peer recruitment n  =  273 (18.4%), Facebook Ads n  =  505 (34%), Google Ads  =  200 (13.4%), ResearchMatch n  =  356 (23.9%) and Smokefree.govn  =  153 (10.3%). Mean enrollment rate per active recruitment month: 1) Peer recruitment, n  =  13.9, 2) Facebook ads, n  =  25.3, 3) Google ads, n  =  10.51, 4) Research Match, n  =  59.3, and 5) Smokefree.gov, n  =  13.9. Peer recruitment recruited the greatest number of males (n  =  110, 40.3%), young adults (n  =  41, 14.7%), participants with a high school degree or less (n  =  24, 12.5%) and smokers within one''s social network. Compared to peer recruitment (retention rate  =  57%), participants from Facebook were less likely (OR 0.46, p  <  0.01, retention rate  =  40%), and those from ResearchMatch were more likely to complete the study (OR 1.90, p  <  0.01, retention rate  =  70%). Peer recruitment was moderate in cost per retained participant ($47.18) and substantially less costly than Facebook ($173.60). CONCLUSIONS: Though peer recruitment had lower enrollment than other strategies, it may provide greater access to harder to reach populations and possibly others who smoke within one''s social network while being moderately cost-effective. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03224520.





Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.