Role matters in understanding 'quality' in palliative care: a qualitative analysis of patient, caregiver and practitioner perspectives.

Holdsworth LM, Giannitrapani K, Gamboa RC, O'Hanlon C, Singh N, Walling A, Lindvall C, Lorenz K. Role matters in understanding 'quality' in palliative care: a qualitative analysis of patient, caregiver and practitioner perspectives. BMJ open. 2024 Jan 17; 14(1):e076768.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• IIR 17-277 – Improving Palliative Measurement Application with Computer-Assisted-Abstraction Study

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To compare the discussions from two panels on the concept of palliative care quality for patients with advanced cancer, exploring the priorities reflected in each group''s perspectives. DESIGN: We convened two RAND-UCLA appropriateness panel discussions on palliative care quality in advanced cancer. Discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Panel transcripts were analysed thematically using a matrix approach to examine perceptions and experiences of quality. SETTING: Discussions were framed within the context of advanced cancer care and palliative care. PARTICIPANTS: The patient-caregiver panel had 9 patients with current or a history of cancer and caregivers, and the practitioner panel had 10 expert practitioners representing fields of oncology, primary care, social work, palliative care, nursing, pain management and ethics. RESULTS: Our analysis identified three thematic categories for understanding quality common across both groups and nine subthemes within those categories. At the highest level, quality was conceived as: (1) the patient and caregiver experience of care, (2) technical competence and (3) the structure of health system. Among the subthemes, four were present in only one of the two group''s discussions: ''purpose and action'' was specific to the patient-caregiver panel, whereas ''adhering to best medical practice'', ''mitigating unintended consequences and side effects'', and ''health system resources and costs'' were specific to the practitioner panel. CONCLUSIONS: While both panels aligned on the three key domains of quality, the particular dimensions through which they perceived quality varied in relation to their experience and role as a professional provider of care versus recipient of healthcare services. These differences suggest the importance of adopting a collaborative approach to quality measurement and improvement so that the values of all interested parties are represented in improvement efforts.