Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

Health Services Research & Development

Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Use of risk-adjusted change in health status to assess the performance of integrated service networks in the Veterans Health Administration

Selim AJ, Berlowitz D, Fincke G, Rogers W, Qian S, Lee A, Cong Z, Selim BJ, Ren XS, Rosen AK, Kazis LE. Use of risk-adjusted change in health status to assess the performance of integrated service networks in the Veterans Health Administration. International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care / ISQua. 2006 Feb 1; 18(1):43-50.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Health outcome assessments have become an expectation of regulatory and accreditation agencies. We examined whether a clinically credible risk adjustment methodology for the outcome of change in health status can be developed for performance assessment of integrated service networks. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: Outpatient. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one thousand eight hundred and twenty-three patients from 22 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) integrated service networks were followed for 18 months. MAIN MEASURE: The physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scales from the Veterans Rand 36-items Health Survey (VR-36) and mortality. The outcomes were decline in PCS (decline in PCS scores greater than -6.5 points or death) and MCS (decline in MCS scores greater than -7.9 points). RESULTS: Four thousand three hundred and twenty-eight (13.6%) patients showed a decline in PCS scores greater than -6.5 points, 4322 (13.5%) had a decline in MCS scores by more than -7.9 points, and 1737 died (5.5%). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to adjust for case-mix. The models performed reasonably well in cross-validated tests of discrimination (c-statistics = 0.72 and 0.68 for decline in PCS and MCS, respectively) and calibration. The resulting risk-adjusted rates of decline in PCS and MCS and ranks of the networks differed considerably from unadjusted ratings. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to develop clinically credible risk adjustment models for the outcomes of decline in PCS and MCS. Without adequate controls for case-mix, we could not determine whether poor patient outcomes reflect poor performance, sicker patients, or other factors. This methodology can help to measure and report the performance of health care systems.





Questions about the HSR&D website? Email the Web Team.

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.