Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Traumatic Finger Amputation: A Retrospective Study.

Agbafe V, Sears ED, Gaines CE, Billig JI. Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Traumatic Finger Amputation: A Retrospective Study. Hand (New York, N.Y.). 2024 Nov 16; 15589447241295288, DOI: 10.1177/15589447241295288.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• CDA 17-169 – Assessing Treatment Delay and Resource Use to Improve Value of Pre-Surgical Care

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Patients face increasing financial toxicity (FT), defined as emotional distress due to the cost of medical treatment. However, little is known regarding FT in the context of upper extremity trauma. METHODS: We surveyed patients who sustained traumatic finger amputation (October 21, 2011-January 1, 2021). We collected patient-reported financial distress using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST-11), where a lower score indicates worse FT. We also collected data of patients'' perceptions regarding the costs of their treatment. We used linear regression to assess patient-level characteristics associated with FT as measured by the COST-11 score. RESULTS: Of the 191 eligible patients, 46 patients completed the survey (response rate of 24%). A total of 41 respondents (89%) received an initial treatment of revision amputation, with the remaining patients receiving a semi-occlusive dressing. Patients with commercial insurance had significantly lower COST-11 scores (ie, worse FT) than patients with Medicare ( = 7.5, 95% CI: 0.5 to 14.5) and Worker''s Compensation ( = 8.7, 95% CI: 1.8 to 15.6). Patients who were single/never married had significantly worse FT ( = -11.3, 95% CI: -18.7 to -3.9). Approximately 35% (n = 16) reported that the costs were higher than expected. More than a third of patients (39%) reported decreasing spending on basic items, such as food, at least once since surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients face FT when obtaining surgery following traumatic finger amputation. Variation in the FT is associated with type of insurance and marriage status, highlighting how underinsurance and social support likely affect the overall economic well-being of patients.