Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government
Veterans Benefits and Health Care About VA Find a VA Location

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Issues in Distinguishing Sex and Gender in Surgical Registries: NSQIP and VASQIP Analysis.

Jacobs, Eckstrand, Gero, Blosnich, Hall. Issues in Distinguishing Sex and Gender in Surgical Registries: NSQIP and VASQIP Analysis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2024 Dec 1; 239(6):548-555, DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001137.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions


Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Surgical registries do not have separate sex (the biological construct) and gender identity variables. We examined procedures specific to sexually dimorphic anatomy, such as ovaries, testes, and other reproductive organs, to identify "discrepancies" between recorded sex and the anatomy of a procedure. These "discrepancies" would represent a structural limitation of surgical registries, one that may unintentionally perpetuate health inequities. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using NSQIP from 2015 to 2019 and Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) from 2016 to 2019. Surgeries were limited to procedures pertaining to anatomy that is either specifically male (CPT codes 54000 to 55899) or female (56405 to 59899). The sex recorded in the surgical registries, often automatically retrieved from electronic health record data, was compared with the specified anatomy of each procedure to quantify discrepancies. RESULTS: A total of 575,956 procedures were identified specific to sexually dimorphic anatomy (549,411 NSQIP and 26,545 VASQIP). Of those, 2,137 recorded a sex discordant with the anatomy specified by the surgical procedure (rates 0.4% in NSQIP and 0.2% in VASQIP). Procedures specific to female anatomy with recorded male sex were more frequent (82.6% in NSQIP and 98.4% in VASQIP) than procedures specific to male anatomy with recorded female sex. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies between recorded sex and the anatomy of a surgical procedure were limited. However, because sex in surgical registries is often directly acquired from electronic health record data, these cases likely represent transgender, gender diverse, or living with a difference of sex development (intersex) patients. As these populations increase and continue to seek healthcare, precise measurement of sex, gender identity, and legal sex is necessary for adequate risk adjustment, risk prediction, and surgical outcomes benchmarking for optimal care.




Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.