Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
An official website of the United States government
Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title
Goldstein, Rushton, Lewinski, Shapiro, Lanford-Davey, Coleman, Chawla, Patel, Van Loon, Shepherd-Banigan, Sims, Cantrell, Alton Dailey, Gierisch. Experiences Receiving and Delivering Virtual Health Care For Women: Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Journal of medical Internet research. 2025 May 15; 27:e68314, DOI: 10.2196/68314.
Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects. BACKGROUND: Persisting sex- and gender-based disparities in access to high-quality, personalized health care in the United States can lead to devastating outcomes with long-lasting consequences. Strategic use of virtual resources could expand equitable health care access for women. However, optimal approaches and timing for individualized, virtually delivered health care for women are unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to conduct a detailed analysis of the current literature to answer the following question: "According to women and their health care teams, what are the reported successes and challenges in accessing, delivering, and participating in synchronous virtual health care for women?" METHODS: We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis using a best-fit framework approach based on the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework and concepts from the Public Health Critical Race Praxis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL from January 1, 2010, to October 10, 2022, using a combination of database-specific, relevant, controlled vocabulary terms and keywords; this search was updated in MEDLINE through January 2024. Additional citations were identified through handsearching. Our eligibility criteria were developed using the Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type tool to identify qualitative studies addressing synchronous virtual care for women. Citations were screened in duplicate, and eligible articles were abstracted. An iterative thematic synthesis approach was used to identify descriptive themes related to the successes and challenges related to delivering high-quality virtual care. Data reduction was performed using inductive and deductive reasoning. Quality assessment was conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program and certainty of evidence using Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approaches. RESULTS: Of 85 eligible articles, we sampled 51 (60%) for data extraction based on representation of patient and clinician perspectives, marginalized voices, and relevance to a variety of clinical contexts. We identified themes across NASSS domains, including difficulty building rapport and emotional connections in the virtual setting, the amplification of barriers for women with preexisting challenges (eg, language barriers, limited transportation, and family and social commitments), and differing perceptions of privacy and safety related to virtual care depending on patient home context. Themes found to have high confidence included the value of convenience and cost savings offered by virtual care, the importance of patient choice in visit modality, the potential for negative impact on user well-being, considering the clinical context of modality choice, the importance of technology usability, and the value of virtual care for women located in regions without adequate supply of clinical offerings. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of virtual care for health care access may be more acutely felt by women, especially those with preexisting challenges. Strategic incorporation of virtual modalities into health care delivery for women could improve equitable access to high quality, patient-centered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021283791; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021283791. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1089/heq.2023.0089.
