Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Prevalence of Stigmatizing Language in the Triage Documentation of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Pain.

Fung, Kehne, Macleod, Logue, Lagisetty. Prevalence of Stigmatizing Language in the Triage Documentation of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Pain. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2025 Jun 1; 73:24-33, DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.12.012.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Stigmatizing language in medical documentation is prevalent and associated with race, gender, age, and weight. Triage documentation may impart an outsized effect on downstream care, communicating information to other clinicians prior to their own evaluation. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of stigmatizing language in triage notes for pain-related emergency department (ED) visits. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study at an urban academic ED. Triage notes between 2017 and 2021 for patients presenting with chest, abdominal, headache, back and injury-related pain were extracted from the electronic health record. A lexicon of stigmatizing words was created a priori from existing literature. Descriptive statistics were used to report the frequency of stigmatizing language by pain type, demographics, and acuity (Emergency Severity Index, ESI). Logistic generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the association between these covariates and stigmatizing language. RESULTS: A total of 51,570 ED visits were included. 2691 triage notes (5.2%) contained at least one stigmatizing word. Male gender (OR: 1.21 95%CI [1.12, 1.31]), Black race (1.11 [1.01, 1.23]), Medicaid (1.29 [1.17, 1.44]) and Medicare (1.22 [1.11, 1.34) insurance were associated with higher odds of stigmatizing language. Back (0.58 [0.49, 0.69]) and injury-related (0.54 [0.47, 0.62]) pain were associated with lower odds compared to visits for abdominal pain. Lower acuity visits (ESI-3 0.77 [0.70, 0.84] and ESI-4 0.52 [0.42, 0.64]) were associated with lower odds when compared to ESI-2. CONCLUSIONS: Stigmatizing language is present in roughly 1 in 20 visits for pain and is disproportionality prevalent in males, Black patients, and those with government insurance.





Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.