Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of the distal femur may be more reliable than the proximal tibia in spinal cord injury.

Morse LR, Lazzari AA, Battaglino R, Stolzmann KL, Matthess KR, Gagnon DR, Davis SA, Garshick E. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of the distal femur may be more reliable than the proximal tibia in spinal cord injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2009 May 1; 90(5):827-31.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• RRP 07-312 – Assessment of Osteoporosis in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the precision of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning at 2 skeletal sites at the knee (proximal femur and distal tibia) in people with SCI. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (N = 20) with chronic SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Precision as determined by root mean square coefficient of variation (RMS-CV) and root mean square standard deviation (RMS-SD). RESULTS: At the distal femur the root RMS-CV was 3.01% and the RMS-SD was 0.025g/cm2. At the proximal tibia the RMS-CV was 5.91% and the RMS-SD was 0.030g/cm2. CONCLUSIONS: Precision at the distal femur is greater than at the proximal tibia and we recommend it as the preferred site for the longitudinal assessment of bone mineral density at the knee in chronic SCI.