Cost, utilization, and policy of provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke by Medicare and VA.

Winkler SL, Vogel B, Hoenig H, Ripley DC, Wu S, Fitzgerald SG, Mann WC, Reker DM. Cost, utilization, and policy of provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke by Medicare and VA. Medical care. 2010 Jun 1; 48(6):558-62.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• RRP 06-184 – VHA Costs of Acute vs Subacute Rehabilitation Care for Stroke

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The increase in provision of assistive technology devices (ATDs) has spurred controversy over Medicare policy aimed at reducing cost-policy that forces social isolation and conflicts with legislation, facilitating participation for individuals with disabilities. In contrast, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) policy does not limit provision of AT to "in home" use only but rather, states "all enrolled and some non-enrolled veterans are eligible for all needed prosthetics." OBJECTIVES: Examine ATD provision policy by comparing 2 systems, Medicare and VA. Empirically analyze differences in ATDs provided, cost, and duplication in provision. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective study of VA databases, including VA Medicare data. SUBJECTS: A population based study of 12,0461 veterans post-stroke. MEASURES: Frequency of provision of ATDs by Health Care Common Procedural Code, purchase price, and capped rental payments. RESULTS: Of the poststroke veteran cohort, 39% received no AT, 56% received AT from the VA only, 1% received AT from Medicare only, and 3% received AT from both the VA and Medicare. Most ATDs were for activities of daily living, followed by walkers/canes/crutches. In specific ATD comparisons, VA costs were substantially lower than Medicare for purchased items and slightly lower than Medicare for capped rental payments. CONCLUSION: VA provides a broader variety of ATDs at a lesser cost than Medicare. Analyses of policy differences between VA and Medicare suggest VA policy is driven by veteran need whereas Medicare policy is driven at least in part, by containing costs that have skyrocketed as a result of fraudulent claims.