Diagnostic utility of signal-averaged electrocardiography for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Schuller JL, Lowery CM, Zipse M, Aleong RG, Varosy PD, Weinberger HD, Sauer WH. Diagnostic utility of signal-averaged electrocardiography for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. 2011 Jan 1; 16(1):70-6.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• IIR 04-046 – Optimal Use and Cost-Effectiveness of ICDS in the VA Health Care System

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) occurs in up to 25% of patients with pulmonary involvement. Early diagnosis is critical because sudden death from ventricular arrhythmias can be the initial presentation. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic utility of signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) for detection of cardiac involvement of sarcoidosis. METHODS: Subjects with biopsy proven sarcoidosis and symptoms suggestive of possible cardiac involvement were included in the cohort. Standard criteria for SAECG were used. Subjects were considered to have CS if they met criteria established by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare modified to include cardiac MRI. RESULTS: Of the 88 patients in the cohort 27 had evidence of CS independent of the SAECG results. The SAECG was abnormal in 14 of these 27 patients and 11 of the 61 of the subjects without cardiac involvement (P < 0.01). The sensitivity of SAECG detection of CS was 52% with a specificity of 82%. For the entire cohort, SAECG had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.56 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.79. Within a subgroup of 67 patients with an unfiltered QRS duration of < 100 ms, the specificity for diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis improves to 100% with a reduced sensitivity of 36.8. Of the SAECG parameters, LAS40 was significantly associated with the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis for the entire cohort (P < 0.01) and among the subgroup of patients with an unfiltered QRS duration of < 100 ms (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SAECG is a useful screening tool in the evaluation of sarcoidosis for detection of cardiac involvement.