Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Colorectal Cancer Screening in Veterans Receiving Primary Care in VA Medical Centers and VA Community Clinics

Malhotra A, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Charlton ME, Rosenthal GE. Colorectal Cancer Screening in Veterans Receiving Primary Care in VA Medical Centers and VA Community Clinics. Poster session presented at: VA HSR&D / QUERI National Meeting; 2012 Jul 17; National Harbor, MD.




Abstract:

Objectives: Compare colorectal cancer (CRC) screening/surveillance rates in Veterans receiving primary care in community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs) and VA medical centers (VAMCs). Methods: The VA Outpatient Care Files were used to identify 3,925,814 patients > 50 years with > 1 primary care (PC) visits in 2010. ICD-9-CM and CPT codes identified Veterans undergoing screening/surveillance colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), and double-contrast barium enema (DCBE). Patients were categorized as VAMC (n = 1,899,267; 48%) or CBOC (2,026,547; 52%) based where most PC encounters occurred, and as high (n = 353,580) or average (n = 3,572,234) risk based on CRC risk factors and validated ICD-9-CM based algorithms. Results: CBOC patients were older than VAMC patients (mean ages, 69.3 vs. 67.4 years; p < .001), more likely (p < .001) to be male (96.7% vs. 95.2%) and white (83.8% vs. 73.6%), but less likely (p < .001) to be high-risk [8.5% vs. 9.5%). Rates of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and DCBE were lower (p < .001) in CBOC patients. Among high-risk patients, rates of screening/surveillance by colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and DCBE were 18.3%, 0.8%, and 0.5%, respectively, in CBOCs, compared to 25.4%, 1.2%, and 0.7% in VAMCs. Among average-risk patients, these rates were 1.0%, 0.1%, and 0.1% in CBOC, and 1.6%, 0.2%, and 0.2% in VAMCs. The differences remained after adjusting for age and comorbidity. For example, the adjusted odds of colonoscopy for CBOC patients were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.79) for average, and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.86) for high-risk patients. In contrast, use of FOBT was relatively similar in CBOCs and VAMCs among both high (10.3% vs. 10.7%) and average-risk (12.8% vs. 12.7%) patients. Interestingly, although high-risk patients accounted for 9% of all patients, they received 62% of all screening/surveillance colonoscopies. Implications: CBOC patients are less likely to receive screening/surveillance colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and DCBE than VAMC patients. The lower rates in CBOC patients were not offset by higher use of screening FOBT. Impacts: CBOC patients are less likely to receive screening/surveillance colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and DCBE than VAMC patients. The lower rates in CBOC patients were not offset by higher use of screening FOBT.





Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.