Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

Health Services Research & Development

Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

A telephone-delivered intervention for patients with NIDDM. Effect on coronary risk factors.

Kirkman MS, Weinberger M, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Shortliffe EA, Simel DL, Feussner JR. A telephone-delivered intervention for patients with NIDDM. Effect on coronary risk factors. Diabetes Care. 1994 Aug 1; 17(8):840-6.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a telephone-delivered intervention (TDI), designed to improve glycemic control in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), improved coronary risk factors in high-risk patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial involved 275 veterans with NIDDM followed in a general medical clinic. Intervention (TDI) patients were telephoned at least monthly by a nurse. Calls emphasized compliance with the medical regimen (diet, medications, and exercise), encouraged behavioral changes, and facilitated referrals to a dietitian or smoking cessation clinic. Control patients received no such calls. Baseline and 12-month follow-up measurements included fasting lipid profiles, weight, smoking status (self-reported; cessation verified by measurement of exhaled CO), adherence to diet and exercise (self-reported), appointments, and medications (hospital computerized data base). RESULTS: After 12 months, equal numbers of obese patients in the two groups reported adhering to a diabetic diet and exercising, although more obese TDI patients had seen a dietitian (30 vs. 7%, P = 0.003). Weight loss was not seen in either group (-0.9 +/- 5.3 vs. -0.1 +/- 3.6 kg, P = 0.202). Hyperlipidemic TDI patients were more likely to see a dietitian (31 vs. 6%, P = 0.003) and receive lipid-lowering medications (22 vs. 9%, P = 0.096), but serum cholesterol reduction was similar between groups (-11.7 +/- 33.4 vs. -4.3 +/- 32.7 mg/dl, P = 0.270); comparable results were seen for high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride levels. More TDI group smokers reported quitting (26 vs. 0%, P = 0.033), but the difference was not significant for CO-verified abstention (10 vs. 0%, P = 0.231). CONCLUSIONS: The TDI improved self-reported adherence to regimens that might reduce coronary risk, but had little effect on objective measures of risk.





Questions about the HSR&D website? Email the Web Team.

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.