Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

Health Services Research & Development

Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Spinal-flexibility-plus-aerobic versus aerobic-only training: effect of a randomized clinical trial on function in at-risk older adults.

Morey MC, Schenkman M, Studenski SA, Chandler JM, Crowley GM, Sullivan RJ, Pieper CF, Doyle ME, Higginbotham MB, Horner RD, MacAller H, Puglisi CM, Morris KG, Weinberger M. Spinal-flexibility-plus-aerobic versus aerobic-only training: effect of a randomized clinical trial on function in at-risk older adults. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 1999 Jul 1; 54(7):M335-42.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

BACKGROUND: As exercise is associated with favorable health outcomes, impaired older adults may benefit from specialized exercise interventions to achieve gains in function. The purpose of this study was to determine the added benefit of a spinal flexibility-plus-aerobic exercise intervention versus aerobic-only exercise on function among community-dwelling elders. METHODS: We employed a randomized clinical trial consisting of 3 months of supervised exercise followed by 6 months of home-based exercise with telephone follow-up. A total of 210 impaired males and females over age 64 enrolled in this study. Of these, 134 were randomly assigned to either spinal flexibility-plus-aerobic exercise or aerobic-only exercise, with 116 individuals completing the study. Primary outcomes obtained at baseline, after 3 months of supervised exercise, and after 6 months of home-based exercise included: axial rotation, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max); functional reach, timed-bed-mobility; and the Physical Function Scale (PhysFunction) of the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. RESULTS: Differences between the two interventions were minimal. Overall change scores for both groups combined indicated significant improvement for: axial rotation (p = .001), VO2max (p = .0001), and PhysFunction (p = .0016). Secondary improvements were noted for overall health (p = .0025) and reduced symptoms (p = .0008). Differences between groups were significant only for VO2max (p = .0014) at 3 months with the aerobic-only group improving twice as much in aerobic capacity as the spinal flexibility-plus-aerobic group. Repeated measures indicated both groups improved during the supervised portion of the intervention but tended to return toward baseline following the home-based portion of the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Gains in physical functioning and perceived overall health are obtained with moderate aerobic exercise. No differential improvements were noted for the spinal flexibility-plus-aerobic intervention.





Questions about the HSR&D website? Email the Web Team.

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.