HSR&D Citation Abstract
Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title
Comparing four competing models of depressive symptomatology: a confirmatory factor analytic study of 986,647 U.S. veterans.
Tsai J, Elhai JD, Pietrzak RH, Hoff RA, Harpaz-Rotem I. Comparing four competing models of depressive symptomatology: a confirmatory factor analytic study of 986,647 U.S. veterans. Journal of affective disorders. 2014 Aug 1; 165:166-9.
Few rigorous studies have examined the factor structure of major depression symptoms as assessed by current diagnostic systems. This study evaluated four competing models of depressive symptomatology among a large, heterogeneous sample of U.S. veterans.
To determine the best fitting model of major depressive symptoms among four competing models, this study conducted a series of confirmatory factor analyses on a national sample of 986,647 U.S. veterans.
A two-factor model first reported by Krause, Reed, and McArdle (2010) provided superior fit to symptom-level data compared to three other models. The optimal model consists of a somatic factor including anhedonia, sleep difficulties, fatigue, appetite changes, concentration difficulties, and psychomotor agitation; and a non-somatic factor including depressed mood, feelings of worthlessness, and thoughts of death. Factorial invariance testing found this model to be invariant by gender and major depression diagnosis.
A widely used self-report measure of depression was used and the sample consisted solely of veterans so further study is needed with clinician-administered measures and non-veteran samples.
Together, these findings support separating symptoms of major depression into somatic and non-somatic factors which may have clinical relevance, and help clarify debates about the factor structure of depressive symptoms.