Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

Health Services Research & Development

Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Detecting Heterogeneous Treatment Effects to Guide Personalized Blood Pressure Treatment: A Modeling Study of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Basu S, Sussman JB, Hayward RA. Detecting Heterogeneous Treatment Effects to Guide Personalized Blood Pressure Treatment: A Modeling Study of Randomized Clinical Trials. Annals of internal medicine. 2017 Mar 7; 166(5):354-360.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

Background: Two recent randomized trials produced discordant results when testing the benefits and harms of treatment to reduce blood pressure (BP) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Objective: To perform a theoretical modeling study to identify whether large, clinically important differences in benefit and harm among patients (heterogeneous treatment effects [HTEs]) can be hidden in, and explain discordant results between, treat-to-target BP trials. Design: Microsimulation. Data Sources: Results of 2 trials comparing standard (systolic BP target < 140 mm Hg) with intensive (systolic BP target < 120 mm Hg) BP treatment and data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013 to 2014). Target Population: U.S. adults. Time Horizon: 5 years. Perspective: Societal. Intervention: BP treatment. Outcome Measures: CVD events and mortality. Results of Base-Case Analysis: Clinically important HTEs could explain differences in outcomes between 2 trials of intensive BP treatment, particularly diminishing benefit with each additional BP agent (for example, adding a second agent reduces CVD risk [hazard ratio, 0.61], but adding a fourth agent to a third has no benefit) and increasing harm at low diastolic BP. Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Conventional treat-to-target trial designs had poor ( < 5%) statistical power to detect the HTEs, despite large samples (n  > 20 000), and produced biased effect estimates. In contrast, a trial with sequential randomization to more intensive therapy achieved greater than 80% power and unbiased HTE estimates, despite small samples (n  = 3500). Limitations: The HTEs as a function of the number of BP agents only were explored. Simulated aggregate data from the trials were used as model inputs because individual-participant data were not available. Conclusion: Clinically important heterogeneity in intensive BP treatment effects remains undetectable in conventional trial designs but can be detected in sequential randomization trial designs. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.





Questions about the HSR&D website? Email the Web Team.

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.