Identifying major hemorrhage with automated data: results of the Veterans Affairs study to improve anticoagulation (VARIA).

Jasuja GK, Reisman JI, Miller DR, Berlowitz DR, Hylek EM, Ash AS, Ozonoff A, Zhao S, Rose AJ. Identifying major hemorrhage with automated data: results of the Veterans Affairs study to improve anticoagulation (VARIA). Thrombosis research. 2013 Jan 1; 131(1):31-6.

Related HSR&D Project(s)

• CDA 08-017 – Quality of Oral Anticoagulation Care in the VHA
• IIR 10-374 – Patient-Level Determinants of Oral Anticoagulation Control in the VHA

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Identifying major bleeding is fundamental to assessing the outcomes of anticoagulation therapy. This drives the need for a credible implementation in automated data for the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) definition of major bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 102,395 patients who received 158,511 person-years of warfarin treatment from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) between 10/1/06-9/30/08. We constructed a list of ICD-9-CM codes of "candidate" bleeding events. Each candidate event was identified as a major hemorrhage if it fulfilled one of four criteria: 1) associated with death within 30days; 2) bleeding in a critical anatomic site; 3) associated with a transfusion; or 4) was coded as the event that precipitated or was responsible for the majority of an inpatient hospitalization. RESULTS: This definition classified 11,240 (15.8%) of 71, 338 candidate events as major hemorrhage. Typically, events more likely to be severe were retained at higher rates than those less likely to be severe. For example, Diverticula of Colon with Hemorrhage (562.12) and Hematuria (599.7) were retained 46% and 4% of the time, respectively. Major, intracranial, and fatal hemorrhage were identified at rates comparable to those found in randomized clinical trials however, higher than those reported in observational studies: 4.73, 1.29, and 0.41 per 100 patient years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We describe here a workable definition for identifying major hemorrhagic events from large automated datasets. This method of identifying major bleeding may have applications for quality measurement, quality improvement, and comparative effectiveness research.