Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
An official website of the United States government
SDP 06-001
Implementation and Evaluation of a VISN-based Program to Improve HIV Screening and Testing
Matthew B Goetz, MD VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA West Los Angeles, CA Funding Period: May 2006 - April 2008 |
|
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE:
Testing for HIV is a high priority for the VA, as earlier case identification reduces both mortality and the cost of treatment by keeping patients with this treatable chronic infection out of the hospital, and encourages reduction of risk behaviors thus preventing further transmission. Unfortunately, many at risk VA patients are not tested for HIV infection. In studies conducted by QUERI-HIV and the Public Health Strategic Healthcare Group (PHSHG) only between 30 and 50% of patients with known, documented risk factors have undergone HIV testing. OBJECTIVE(S): We surveyed providers and managers as to the barriers to increasing HIV testing rates. We found that lack of accountability, low prioritization, the time needed to discuss sensitive issues, and organizational barriers to pre and post test counseling ranked among the most important. To improve HIV testing rates for higher than average risk patients, we will implement an integrated program utilizing proven quality improvement techniques in VISN 22. The specific goals for this project were: 1) To evaluate the effect of interventions designed to improve HIV screening and testing rates in VISN 22. 2) To refine the intervention using an iterative process evaluative technique. 3) To develop a "Business Case" analysis of HIV testing rates in other VISNs. 4) To develop an exportable model for increasing HIV testing rates in other VISNs. METHODS: This project was built upon the successful foundational pilot work that was supported by Locally Initiated Project funds (Supplemental QLP HIV-AIDS, HIV 04-386) and QUERI-HIV core funds. In this work, we pilot tested a series quality improvement interventions to increase the rates of HIV testing in the VA Greater Los Angeles and San Diego Healthcare Systems; the 3 other VISN22 facilities served as controls. The specific interventions were: 1.) clinical reminders, i.e., a real time, context-specific, computerized clinical reminder for HIV testing of individual patients; 2.) audit/feedback, i.e., a retrospective summary of group and provider-specific HIV screening for groups of at-risk patients; 3.) provider activation via established academic detailing and social marketing methodology; and 4.) organizational change to remove barriers to performance of HIV testing. The outcomes of this intervention are being evaluated qualitatively (i.e., via surveys of providers) and quantitatively (assessment of HIV testing rates in facilities that do or do not receive the intervention). We implemented this research plan in a quasi-experimental manner in the VA San Diego and Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System followed by time-series experiments involving the VA Las Vegas and Loma Linda facilities; VA Long Beach served as a control. FINDINGS/RESULTS: During the first year of the intervention (during which time sites A & B were active intervention sites and sites C, D & E served as controls) , the cumulative rate at which at risk individuals had ever been tested for HIV infection increased from 16 - 22% to 24 - 34% at the active intervention facilities (A & B; p < 0.05). In contrast, the cumulative rate of testing at the control facilities was 14 - 18% and did not change. During the subsequent year, the provider activation program was deintensified at sites A & B; the full intervention was introduced in sites C & D; site E remained in the control arm. During this year, the cumulative rates of testing further increased to 28 - 37% at facilities A & B (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, after implementation at facilities C & D, the rates of cumulative HIV testing increased from 14% to 20.1% (facility C, month 3) and from 23% to 29.4% (facility D, month 4). .Analyses of the sustainability of the intervention indicated that selective deintensification of provider activation programs was followed by reduced rates of HIV testing that nevertheless remained well above baseline among new patients. The test acceptance rate increased throughout the study period, suggesting that providers either became more proficient at encouraging patients to be tested or offered testing only to selected patients. Business case modeling indicated that for a facility has 20,000 at-risk patients, there was a $75,000 - $167,000 increase in the costs of HIV testing in the first quarter, which later diminished as the pool of untested patients decreased. Overall the costs associated with expansion of HIV testing programs represent a small fraction of the estimated outpatient costs of HIV care, which for a facility that cares for 100 - 400 patients, amount to $200 - $800,000/quarter. IMPACT: We have demonstrated that an integrated quality improvement project can increase rates of HIV testing. Our sustainability analysis indicates that attenuation of the provider activation program is associated with a diminution of the rates of HIV testing which nonetheless remained well above the baseline rates. Based on the success of this project, we have designed a regional, multi-VISN project to confirm, extend and refine the interventions that were proven to be successful in this multi-station, single VISN trial. The goals of this next project, which is being conducted in partnership with the VA Public Health Strategic Healthcare Group and with support of SDP 08-002) are to: - Evaluate two alternative refined versions of the intervention to improve HIV testing rates in two geographically varied VISNs. This will make use of a study design in which stations will be randomized to receive differing levels of formal provider activation. - Identify regional variations as well as neglected populations and identify remediation strategies. Particular attention will be paid to OIF/OEF veterans who are at highest risk soon after their return from service. - Further evaluate service-specific implementation costs of this program, by generalizing the business case model developed for VISN 22. - Identify organizational requisites (e.g., structure, training) for the success of this intervention. The work accomplished under the aegis of SDP 08-002 will allow us to shape the next phase of the project, for which we are already in the planning stages with the VA Public Health Strategic Healthcare Group, namely the dissemination of the program to other VISNs. The net result will lead to earlier identification and treatment of HIV-infected patients and consequent improved medical outcomes for these persons. Finally, an additional impact of this program is that HIV testing has now been approved as a Performance Measure by the VISN 22 Quality Performance Improvement Committee, thus providing long-term institutional support for sustaining the interventions that were put in place by this project and providing ongoing local incentives to maintain the observed improvements in HIV testing rates. External Links for this ProjectDimensions for VA Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects. Learn more about Dimensions for VA. VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address. Search Dimensions for this project PUBLICATIONS:Journal Articles
DRA:
none
DRE: Diagnosis, Prevention Keywords: HIV/AIDS, Screening MeSH Terms: none |
