SDR 08-377
Evaluation of VA's TBI Clinical Reminder And Secondary Level Evaluation
Judi L Babcock-Parziale, PhD Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson, AZ Tucson, AZ Funding Period: May 2009 - December 2011 Portfolio Assignment: Traumatic Brain Injury |
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE:
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading injury among military personnel serving in the Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) combat theaters due largely to improvised explosive devices. Since symptoms of mild TBI (mTBI) are reported many months after combat exposures, and reported symptoms may be indicative of mental health conditions, mild TBI is difficult to identify and diagnose. In order to identify OEF/OIF Veterans at risk for mTBI, in 2007 the VA implemented a national TBI Clinical Reminder (TCR) to screen Veterans for mTBI. Veterans who screen positive are referred for the secondary, Comprehensive TBI Evaluation (CTBIE). Given the urgent clinical needs of these Veterans, both instruments were implemented prior to scientific evaluation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic validity and reliability of the TCR and the CTBIE. OBJECTIVE(S): Objectives for the diagnostic accuracy study included: (1) To develop an mTBI Expert-Derived Assessment Battery (EDAB) and a corresponding Diagnostic Algorithm to serve as the criterion standard. This was developed using evidence derived from (a) a systematic review of published diagnostic accuracy studies using the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) criteria; and (b) a Delphi survey of mTBI experts regarding the diagnostic issues that continue to lack expert consensus. (2) To evaluate the diagnostic validity of the TCR and the CTBIE through an examination of: (a) sensitivity, specificity, false negatives and positives, and positive/negative predictive values of the TCR relative to a standardized mTBI Structured Interview (MSI), and the CTBIE relative to the EDAB; (b) concordance between measures of functional impairment and the TCR and CTBIE; (c) the concurrent validity between the clinical symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of TBI on the criterion standard (EDAB) and measures of functional impairment; and (d) the test/retest reliability for the TCR and the CTBIE. METHODS: The mixed methods project recruited OEF/OIF Veterans over 12-months at three VA Polytrauma Network Sites (PNS) including Southern Arizona/Tucson, Hines and Lexington. The sample was recruited through PNS clinics (1/3) and via OEF/OIF VA registries of personnel returning to VISN 18, 12, and 9 following deployment. Enrolled subjects were initially screened in the VA with the TCR. Regardless of TCR screen results, all subjects were evaluated on the CTBIE by VA or research clinicians. Research clinicians administered specified EDAB tests to all subjects. Two neuropsychologists then completed independent and blinded reviews using the Diagnostic Algorithm and were not privy to TCR and CTBIE results. Subjects were diagnosed with or without history of mTBI and categorized as being healthy controls, having symptoms resolved, or having current symptoms consistent with mTBI, PTSD, or mTBI + PTSD. (This parallels the diagnostic scoring used for the CTBIE.) To address reliability, subjects from Hines also participated in a one-week test /retest of the TCR and CTBIE. FINDINGS/RESULTS: A sample of 438 OEF/OIF Veterans enrolled across the three sites (Tucson = 131; Hines = 134; Lexington = 173) and included largely Caucasian (77%) males (90%). Prior to deployment, the majority of subjects were employed full-time by the military (61%) with 22% employed on a full-time basis in a non-military job, 13% full-time students, and 4% employed in a part-time, non-military job. Forty-five percent of subjects screened positive for mTBI on the TCR, and 69% of this group were diagnosed with PTSD using the CAPS "moderate" scoring criteria (F1/I2 plus total severity > 45). In comparison, using the criterion or MSI, 47% screened positive for mTBI and 71% of this group were diagnosed with PTSD using the CAPS "moderate" scoring criteria. Evaluating the TCR with the criterion standard indicates a Sensitivity (Se) of 79% (95%CI: 73-85), Specificity (Sp) of 85% (95% CI: 81-90), False Negatives (FN) of 15%, False Positives (FP) of 21%, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 49% and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 96%. Using a conservative mTBI prevalence rate of 15%, the accuracy of these indices is 84%. Evaluation of the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation (CTBIE) with the criterion standard was conducted after excluding 104 subjects who failed tests of effort. Findings indicate that the CTBIE identified mTBI with 74% Se (95%CI: 66-81), 87% Sp (95%CI: 82-92), 26% FN, 13% FP, 13% PPV, and 95% NPV. Using the 15% prevalence rate, the accuracy is 85%. The test/retest reliability of the TCR and CTBIE was assessed using a G-Theory analysis (n=87). The TCR and selected CTBIE items were stable and performed well regardless of the time of administration (TCR: ICC=0.91; CTBIE: ICC=0.98). IMPACT: The TBI Clinical Reminder, used to screen for mTBI in returning Veterans, demonstrates adequate diagnostic validity and reliability. The high negative predictive value for both the TCR and CTBIE indicate that Veterans diagnosed as negative for mTBI can be assured that they do not have the condition. The EDAB Diagnostic Algorithm may improve the diagnostic accuracy of the CTBIE (i.e., increase sensitivity) by providing clinicians with a standardized method of distinguishing between cognitive, affective, and somatic symptoms commonly shared by mTBI and PTSD. External Links for this ProjectDimensions for VADimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.Learn more about Dimensions for VA. VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address. Search Dimensions for this project PUBLICATIONS:Journal Articles
DRA:
Military and Environmental Exposures, Health Systems Science, Acute and Combat-Related Injury, Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders
DRE: Diagnosis, Prevention Keywords: PTSD, Traumatic Brain Injury MeSH Terms: none |