Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

IIR 07-175 – HSR Study

IIR 07-175
VA Physician Adherence to Colonoscopy Guidelines
Deborah A Fisher, MD MHS
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, NC
Funding Period: May 2009 - April 2012
The recommended interval for the next colonoscopy is based on the endoscopic and pathologic findings of the initial colonoscopy. These intervals range from 3 to 10 years. Recent questionnaire studies report that physicians in the community setting recommend repeat colonoscopies sooner than recommended by published guidelines. Adherence to colonoscopy guidelines in the VA healthcare system is unknown. Physician recommendations of procedures are a key factor in health care utilization. Therefore, recommendations for colonoscopies that exceed guidelines may lead to overuse. Overuse of colonoscopy is expensive, reduces the capacity to perform initial screening or diagnostic colonoscopies, and places veterans at unjustified risk.

The overall goal of this study was to determine if VA physicians follow published guidelines in their recommendations for when colonoscopy should be repeated, and to identify productive targets for modifying provider behavior.

Aim 1: To document the current patterns of repeat colonoscopy recommendation in the VA healthcare system with respect to findings at index colonoscopy, and to compare provider recommendations for repeat colonoscopies to the published multi-society guidelines.

Aim 2: To identify patient, physician, and organizational factors associated with any departure from guidelines.

Data abstracted from the VA electronic medical record (VistAWeb), VA administrative claims, and physician databases were analyzed for a national random sample of VA patients, aged 50-64 years, who had recently undergone colonoscopy and had had no prior colonoscopies for at least 10 years. We estimated the proportion of colonoscopies for which the endoscopist followed guidelines in recommending the interval until the next colonoscopy. Logistic regression modeling, with evaluation of clustering, was used to assess predictors of guideline adherence.

Rates of non-adherence were 37% (532/1455) overall, 26% (236/893) for normal colonoscopy, 61% (123/203) for hyperplastic polyps, 46% (107/231) for low risk adenomas, and 52% (66/128) for higher risk adenomas. The non-adherent follow-up interval was earlier than recommended by guidelines for 100% of the normal, hyperplastic and low risk adenoma patients and for 86% of the higher risk adenoma patients. Adjusted modeling indicated clinical group and geographic region were associated with non-adherence.

There were no significant associations between the following variables and non-adherence to the published guidelines: years in practice, physician specialty, and physician board certification. Compared to male physicians, female physicians were 2.27 (95% CI: 1.01, 5.09) times more likely to be non-adherent to the published guidelines in the "no polyp/normal tissue" group. However, the same was not true for the "hyperplastic" group (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.48, 3.55) and the "1-2 adenomas < 1 cm in size" group (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.97). Out of the 25 facilities, adherence ranged from 2.7% - 100%; 12 facilities (48%) had adherence rates of > 80%, 8 (32%) had adherence rates of 60-79%, and 5 (24%) had adherence rates of < 60%.

Among the 2443 colonoscopies, 476 (19%) were missing documentation of prep adequacy. Missing documentation among the 25 facilities ranged from 0 to 70%. Among the 1967 patients with documentation of prep quality, 145 (7%) were reported as inadequate. Proportion of patients at each facility with inadequate colon cleansing ranged from 1% to 48%. Cecal intubation was achieved in 64% and 94% of patients with inadequate and adequate bowel preparation, respectively, p<0.001. VA facilities in the Northeast and Midwest had a greater proportion of colonoscopies with missing bowel prep documentation as well as inadequate colon cleansing (p<0.0001 and p<0.001, respectively). Predictors of missing prep quality documentation on multivariate analysis were geographic region, non-gastroenterologist specialty, and trainee involvement.

Our study identified potential targets for quality improvement measures in the VA healthcare system. Future intervention studies are needed to address potential barriers to guideline-concordance at the facility level, as our study found that there was significant variation on guideline adherence at both the facility level and across geographic regions. Colonoscopy capacity within the VA may be increased by interventions to reduce overuse for polyp surveillance. Future research is also needed to identify ways to improve consistency across VA facilities with regards to clinical indicators such as adequacy of bowel prep, which was also found to vary significantly by facility and geographic region. Clinical documentation of determinants of the diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy such as documentation of bowel prep quality also varied by geographic region, specialty, and trainee involvement. Potential clinical applications such as a system-wide endoscopy software program that would facilitate improved documentation of key performance variables would facilitate improved documentation of key performance variables and allow real-time assessment of quality measures and quality improvement after interventions.

External Links for this Project

Dimensions for VA

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

Learn more about Dimensions for VA.

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
    Search Dimensions for this project


Journal Articles

  1. Provenzale D. A guide for success as a clinical investigator. Gastroenterology. 2012 Mar 1; 142(3):418-21. [view]
  2. Shah T, Grambow SC, Johnson MR, Provenzale D, Maciejewski ML, Fisher DA. Adequacy of Bowel Preparation and Documentation of Bowel Preparation Quality at Index Colonoscopy in the VA Health Care System. Gastroenterology. 2012 May 1; 142(5):S-225-S-226. [view]
  3. Long MD, Lance T, Robertson D, Kahwati L, Kinsinger L, Fisher DA. Colorectal cancer testing in the national Veterans Health Administration. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2012 Feb 1; 57(2):288-93. [view]
  4. Fisher DA, Grubber J, Grambow SC, Johnson MR. Factors Associated With Non-Adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in an Integrated Managed Care System. Gastroenterology. 2012 May 1; 142(5):S-80. [view]
  5. Balmadrid BL, Thomas CM, Coffman CJ, Liddle RA, Fisher DA. Factors associated with survival of veterans with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Journal of cancer epidemiology. 2012 May 27; 2012:986708. [view]
  6. Johnson MR, Grubber J, Grambow SC, Maciejewski ML, Dunn-Thomas T, Provenzale D, Fisher DA. Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Gastroenterology. 2015 Oct 1; 149(4):938-51. [view]
  7. Hwang JH, Fisher DA, Ben-Menachem T, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi K, Decker GA, Early DS, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Foley K, Fukami N, Jain R, Jue TL, Khan KM, Lightdale J, Malpas PM, Maple JT, Pasha S, Saltzman J, Sharaf R, Shergill AK, Dominitz JA, Cash BD, Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The role of endoscopy in the management of acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2012 Jun 1; 75(6):1132-8. [view]
  8. Shah TU, Voils CI, McNeil R, Wu R, Fisher DA. Understanding gastroenterologist adherence to polyp surveillance guidelines. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2012 Sep 1; 107(9):1283-7. [view]
  9. Jackson GL, Zullig LL, Zafar SY, Powell AA, Ordin DL, Gellad ZF, Abbott D, Schlosser JM, Hersh J, Provenzale D. Using NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology to measure the quality of colorectal cancer care in the veterans health administration. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2013 Apr 1; 11(4):431-41. [view]
Conference Presentations

  1. Zullig LL, Jackson GL, Weinberger M, Provenzale D, Reeve BB, Carpenter WR. Are There Racial Differences in Colorectal Cancer Care Timeliness among Users of the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System? Poster session presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; 2013 Jun 4; Chicago, IL. [view]
  2. Fisher DA, Grubber J, Murphy C, Johnson MR, Sandler RS, Provenzale D. Overuse and Underuse of Colonoscopy for Screening and Surveillance in an Integrated Managed Care System. Poster session presented at: VA HSR&D / QUERI National Meeting; 2015 Jul 9; Philadelphia, PA. [view]
  3. Provenzale D. Physician and Patient Factors as Potential Predictors of Non-Adherence to Colonosocopy Guidelines in an Integrated Managed Care System. Poster session presented at: VA Durham VAMC Annual Research Week; 2013 May 15; Durham, NC. [view]
  4. Zullig LL, Provenzale D, McNeil R, Abbott D, Jackson GL. The Effect of Race on Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Surveillance Colonoscopy. Presented at: Association of VA Hematology/Oncology Annual Meeting; 2011 Oct 10; Kansas City, MO. [view]

DRA: Health Systems, Cancer
DRE: Diagnosis, Prevention
Keywords: Behavior (provider), Cancer, Screening
MeSH Terms: none

Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.