IIR 10-136
Comparative Effectiveness of Anti-diabetic Medication Alternatives for Veterans
Steven Daniel Pizer, PhD VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA Boston, MA Funding Period: April 2011 - November 2013 |
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE:
Twenty percent of VA users are estimated to have Type 2 diabetes. In the VA, metformin is commonly used as first line therapy and the usual recommended second-line agent is a member of the sulfonylurea class. Despite the availability and function of these two classes of medication, over half of VA patients with diabetes require further blood sugar lowering medication beyond metformin and sulfonylurea (MET-SU). The two most common drug classes used for patients not achieving adequate glycemic control on MET-SU are thiazolidinediones (TZDs), short- and long-acting insulin, insulin analogues, and human insulin. Unfortunately, there are few data comparing the effectiveness of various medications available for use at this treatment transition. OBJECTIVE(S): This project aims to describe the variation in glucose lowering medication prescribing patterns throughout the VA in patients who transition from MET-SU to additional treatments. We will develop a statistical model that predicts variation in glucose lowering medication prescribing patterns. In addition, we will estimate the relationship between anti-diabetic medication prescribing patterns and short and longer-term health outcomes. METHODS: This study will examine the causal relationship between prescribing patterns and risk-adjusted health outcomes using a unique national sample of VA patients diagnosed with diabetes (between January 1st, 2000 and December 31st, 2005) and instrumental variables analysis. The criteria for identifying diabetes will be a prescription for anti-diabetes medication in the current year and/or 2+ diabetes codes for inpatient and/or outpatient visits over a two month period. We will require that all patients in the cohort have a medication history that includes both MET-SU and that they add at least one TZD or type of insulin at some point during the study. For risk adjustment and outcomes we will limit the cohort to individuals who are low-income and eligible for Medicare. We will follow all individuals through 2010, but will not add new patients to the cohort after 2005. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Preliminary findings indicated that ongoing use of sulfonylureas after initiation of a 3rd diabetes medication is associated with increased risk of hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Additional analyses demonstrated that initiation of sulfonylureas as a 2nd diabetes medication is also associated with increased risks of hospitalization and mortality. A comparison of outcomes among patients starting NPH or alalogue insulin found no siginificant difference between the two medication classes. IMPACT: Our findings imply that clinicians should balance the potential benefits of continued use of sulfonylureas against the previously unreported risks of hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions and mortality. Clinicians and managers should also be aware of the lack of improved outcomes associated with the use of analogue insulin, which is more costly than NPH. External Links for this ProjectNIH ReporterGrant Number: I01HX000422-01A1Link: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8079883 Dimensions for VADimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.Learn more about Dimensions for VA. VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address. Search Dimensions for this project PUBLICATIONS:Journal Articles
DRA:
Diabetes and Other Endocrine Conditions
DRE: Treatment - Comparative Effectiveness Keywords: none MeSH Terms: none |