Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

PPO 13-117 – HSR Study

PPO 13-117
Evaluating Innovative Care Models for High-Utilizing Patients
Donna M Zulman, MD MS
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Funding Period: December 2013 - May 2015
VA's highest-utilizing patients generally have complicated health care needs-including complex and multiple chronic conditions, comorbid mental health conditions, and social stressors-that contribute to high rates of hospitalization, emergency services, and specialty care. Inspired by emerging intensive primary care models for high-utilizers, VA Palo Alto obtained FY2012-FY2013 Office of Specialty Care Transformation (OSCT) funding to launch a novel program that augments the existing PACT model with intensive care delivered by a multidisciplinary team. The Intensive Management PACT (ImPACT) intervention encompasses a number of evidence-based strategies, including a comprehensive intake process, coordination of specialty care, chronic condition case management, rapid intervention in response to deteriorations in health, and facilitation of transitions after high-acuity events.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the ImPACT intervention at VA Palo Alto.

We partnered with the implementation team of VA Palo Alto's ImPACT program to conduct a Hybrid Type 1 evaluation of the program's feasibility, implementation, and effectiveness. Patients were eligible for ImPACT if their VA health care costs or risk for hospitalization (based on the Care Assessment Needs Score) were in the top 5% for the facility, they were outpatients for over half of the eligibility period, and they were not enrolled in another VA intensive management program (e.g., MHICM, HBPC) or palliative care. Among 583 eligible patients, 150 randomly selected individuals were invited to enroll in ImPACT; the remaining ImPACT-eligible patients received standard PACT care and served as a control group. An implementation evaluation was conducted at 9 months and involved semi-structured interviews (n = 15) with ImPACT and PACT team members and facility leadership. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to evaluate implementation facilitators and barriers, using standard content analysis methods for coding and synthesizing textual data. An evaluation of the program's effectiveness was conducted after the program had been in place for 17 months. We evaluated changes in total health care costs (including intervention costs), hospital admissions, and emergency department visits among ImPACT and PACT patients, excluding those who died or moved away before the intervention began (n=38), across a 16-month baseline and 17-month follow-up period. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis within a difference-in-differences framework. In secondary analyses, we estimated the effect of the intervention on patients who actively participated in ImPACT using randomization as an instrument for participation. We also conducted stratified analyses to examine the influence of age, comorbid mental health and medical conditions, and baseline risk for hospitalization. We assessed changes in satisfaction with VA care using ImPACT patients' responses to the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire at baseline and 6 months after enrollment.

Two-thirds of invited patients (n=101) enrolled in ImPACT, 87% of whom remained actively engaged at 9 months. Patients who engaged in ImPACT (69%), had a mean (SD) of 10 (4) chronic conditions; 65% had a mental health diagnosis and 22% had a history of homelessness. Implementation was influenced most notably by three CFIR domains. First, the Inner Setting (i.e., the organizational environment), mostly enabled implementation through a culture of innovation, good networks and communication, and positive tension for change. Second, Characteristics of Individuals, including clinical and interpersonal expertise, also enabled implementation. Finally, Intervention Characteristics, enabled implementation (e.g., through adaptability) and impeded implementation (e.g., through complexity, which generated confusion). In the quantitative evaluation, after accounting for program costs, adjusted monthly healthcare expenditures decreased similarly for ImPACT compared to PACT patients (D-in-D (SE) -$101 ($623)). There were no differences in acute care utilization patterns between ImPACT and PACT patients. Greater, but non-statistically significant, cost reductions were observed for ImPACT patients who were under age 65, those with a recent hospitalization, and individuals with heart failure, diabetes, or chronic lung disease. ImPACT patients reported increases in satisfaction with VA care (p < 0.05) and communication (p < 0.05) (56% response rate).

Findings suggest that the ImPACT intervention improved patient satisfaction and experience, and provided intensive primary care services and care coordination without significantly increasing costs. Study findings are directly informing the VA's Office of Primary Care PACT-Intensive Management Demonstration Project, specifically by guiding patient selection criteria and PIM team interventions. Findings have also informed the development of new recommendations in the PACT Roadmap for High Risk Patients.

External Links for this Project

NIH Reporter

Grant Number: I21HX001308-01

Dimensions for VA

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

Learn more about Dimensions for VA.

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
    Search Dimensions for this project


None at this time.

DRA: Health Systems
DRE: Treatment - Observational
Keywords: none
MeSH Terms: none

Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.