Quality of referrals for glaucoma assessment: a cross-sectional survey of clinical data and outcomes.

Szulborski KJ, Weintraub DS, Roh S, Alwreikat AM, Cooper ML, Cotran PR, Ramsey DJ. Quality of referrals for glaucoma assessment: a cross-sectional survey of clinical data and outcomes. International ophthalmology. 2021 Dec 1; 41(12):4065-4073.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.    Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions

Search for Abstract from PubMed

---

Abstract:

PURPOSE: This study assessed the completeness of clinical information provided by ophthalmological and optometric referrals to glaucoma specialists consulting for open-angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional study of 72 internal referrals for evaluation of OAG in a multispecialty group practice was performed. The quality of the referral was assessed based on: (1) the completeness of the clinical triad of intraocular pressure measurement, visual field (VF), and cup-to-disk ratio for each eye; (2) the availability of the data necessary to calculate an ocular hypertension treatment study (OHTS) score; and (3) the presence of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) imaging by mean of optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: The clinical triad was available in 57% of referrals, whereas an OHTS score was calculable in 24% of referrals (p? < 0.001); RNLF imaging was available in 51% of referrals (p? = 0.859). The completeness of clinical information was similar for ophthalmological and optometric referrals. From the date of referral to the time of the consultation, there was a significant increase in the availability of the clinical triad (57-65%; p? = 0.013) and the OHTS score (24-5%; p? = 0.004) but not for RNFL imaging (51-56%; p? = 0.618). The most common missing clinical information was VF testing, which was absent in 42% of referrals. CONCLUSIONS: Key clinical data necessary for effective diagnosis and staging of OAG was lacking for many patients referred to glaucoma specialists.