Talk to the Veterans Crisis Line now
U.S. flag
An official website of the United States government

VA Health Systems Research

Go to the VA ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

HSR&D Citation Abstract

Search | Search by Center | Search by Source | Keywords in Title

Differences in Nursing Home Quality Between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Patients.

Chang E, Ruder T, Setodji C, Saliba D, Hanson M, Zingmond DS, Wenger NS, Ganz DA. Differences in Nursing Home Quality Between Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Patients. Journal of The American Medical Directors Association. 2016 Oct 1; 17(10):960.e9-960.e14.

Dimensions for VA is a web-based tool available to VA staff that enables detailed searches of published research and research projects.

If you have VA-Intranet access, click here for more information vaww.hsrd.research.va.gov/dimensions/

VA staff not currently on the VA network can access Dimensions by registering for an account using their VA email address.
   Search Dimensions for VA for this citation
* Don't have VA-internal network access or a VA email address? Try searching the free-to-the-public version of Dimensions



Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment is steadily growing, but little is known about the quality of nursing home (NH) care provided to MA enrollees compared to enrollees in traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. OBJECTIVES: To compare MA and FFS enrollees' quality of NH care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: US nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: 2.17 million Medicare enrollees receiving care at an NH during 2011. MEASUREMENTS: CMS methodology was used to calculate the 18 Nursing Home Compare quality measures as applicable for each enrollee. RESULTS: Among Medicare enrollees using NH in 2011, 17% were in MA plans. Most quality scores were similar between MA and FFS. After adjusting for facility, beneficiary age and gender, CMS Hierarchical Condition Category score, and geographic region, short-stay MA enrollees had statistically significantly lower rates of new or worsening pressure ulcers [relative risk (RR)  =  0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI)  =  0.71-0.82] and new antipsychotic use (RR  =  0.82, 95% CI  =  0.80-0.83) but higher rates of moderate to severe pain (RR  =  1.09, 95% CI  = 1.07-1.12), compared with short-stay FFS enrollees. MA long-stay enrollees had lower rates of antipsychotic use (RR  =  0.94, 95% CI  =  0.93-0.96) but had higher rates of incontinence (RR  =  1.08, 95% CI  =  1.06-1.09) and urinary catheterization (RR  =  1.10, 95% CI  =  1.06-1.13), compared with long-stay FFS enrollees. CONCLUSION: Overall, we found few differences in NH quality scores between MA and FFS Medicare enrollees. MA enrollment was associated with better scores for pressure ulcers and antipsychotic use but worse scores for pain control, incontinence, and urinary catheterization. Results may be limited by residual case-mix differences between MA and FFS patients or by the small number of short-stay measures reported.





Questions about the HSR website? Email the Web Team

Any health information on this website is strictly for informational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. It should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition.