Health Services Research & Development

Veterans Crisis Line Badge
Go to the ORD website
Go to the QUERI website

Publication Briefs



HSR&D Publication Briefs
view more Pub Briefs
 

Get RSS Feeds  

Interactive Communication between Primary Care and Specialty Care Improves Patient Outcomes


FINDINGS:

  • Interactive communications between collaborating primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists were associated with improved patient outcomes. Interactive communication methods included: initial joint patient consultations, regular specialist attendance at primary care team meetings, telepsychiatry with primary care physicians, scheduled phone discussions, and shared electronic progress notes.
  • The studies in this review all involved collaborations with psychiatrists for management of depression and other mental health disorders and with endocrinologists for management of diabetes; however, the consistency of the effects across different primary care-specialty collaborations, healthcare conditions, and study designs suggests the potential for improvement across other specialties and conditions.
  • Effectiveness was enhanced by interventions to improve the quality of information exchange (e.g., needs assessment, joint care planning).
  • There were no significant differences in effect sizes between studies based in integrated vs. non-integrated healthcare systems.

BACKGROUND:
Poor coordination between primary and specialty care can contribute to avoidable patient morbidity and mortality. Current chronic illness care improvement initiatives, such as the patient-centered medical home, aim to improve collaboration by identifying a clinical team or practice as having support for care coordination. However, it is uncertain whether collaborative care models that enable interactive communication - timely two-way exchange of patient information between primary care and specialists - improve patient outcomes. Investigators reviewed 23 studies (including VA studies) to assess the effects of interactive communication between collaborating primary care physicians and key specialists on outcomes for patients receiving ambulatory care who also had received psychiatric, endocrine, or cancer diagnoses. The studies reviewed in this meta-analysis included: 11 randomized mental health studies, 7 non-randomized mental health studies, and 5 non-randomized diabetes studies.

LIMITATIONS:

  • Collaborative interventions are inherently multifaceted, so investigators could not conclude that interactive communication between PCPs and specialists was effective by itself.

NOTE:

  • Further research on how best to structure interaction between PCPs and specialists may be key to maximizing the success of integrated care models, such as the patient-centered medical home.

AUTHOR/FUNDING INFORMATION:
This study was partly funded by HSR&D. Drs. Rubenstein and Shekelle are part of HSR&D's Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior in Sepulveda, CA.


PubMed Logo Foy R, Hempel S, Rubenstein L, Suttorp M, Seelig M, Shanman R, and Shekelle P. Meta-Analysis: Effect of Interactive Communication between Collaborating Primary Care Physicians and Specialists. Annals of Internal Medicine February 16, 2010;152(4):247-58.

Related Briefs

» next 52 Diabetes Briefs...


» next 205 Mental Health Briefs...


What are HSR&D Publication Briefs?

HSR&D requires notification by HSR&D-funded investigators about all articles accepted for publication. These journal articles are reviewed by HSR&D and publication briefs or summaries are written for a select number of articles that are then forwarded to VHA Central Office leadership to keep them informed about important findings or information. Articles to be summarized are selected by HSR&D based on timeliness of the findings, interest of leadership, or potential impact on the organization. Publication briefs are written for only a small number of HSR&D published articles. Visit the HSR&D citations database for a complete listing of HSR&D articles and presentations.