» Back to Table of Contents
One of Secretary Shulkin's top five priorities
is "improving timeliness of services." Meeting
this priority will require strategies that emphasize
efficiency in healthcare delivery such as
the VA Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs).
Launched in 2011, PACT uses alternative formats
for care delivery such as shared medical
appointments and telemedicine. PACT also
embraces the value of team-based care. In this
spirit, new strategies for expanding the roles
and responsibilities of interdisciplinary PACT
team members, including nurses, are being
developed and tested. One such strategy is
"nurse-managed protocols," whereby nurses
take on an expanded role in the management
of selected chronic medical conditions by following
a protocol set by current clinical guidelines
or standards of practice.
The VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program
(ESP) provides timely and accurate syntheses
of targeted healthcare topics of importance
to clinicians, managers, and policymakers. In
the past decade, the four VA ESP centers have
supported VA policy and clinicians with more
than 125 evidence reports. The Durham ESP
completed a synthesis of studies evaluating
nurse-managed protocols for the outpatient
management of adults with type 2 diabetes,
hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and congestive
heart failure (CHF).1, 2 Investigators examined
peer-reviewed publications from January
1980 through December 2012 that evaluated
interventions using nurse-managed protocols
compared with usual care targeting adults with
the aforementioned conditions. The evidence
review included 29 unique studies, of which 26
were randomized controlled trials.
One of the key questions examined by
the evidence review is whether nursemanaged
protocols (compared with usual
care) improve indicators of clinical quality
and resource utilization of Veterans with
chronic medical conditions. Overall, the
evidence review found that for patients with
elevated cardiovascular risk, interventions
using nurse-managed protocols had a small
to moderate positive effect on improving
HbA1c, blood pressure, and hyperlipidemia,
but effects varied substantially across
studies. Nurse-managed protocols compared
with usual care also were associated
with more patients reaching target goals in
total cholesterol and blood pressure.
For patients with CHF, nurse-managed protocols
were associated with lower all-cause
mortality, more patients being prescribed
an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor
or angiotensin receptor blocking (ACE/
ARB) agent, and decreased CHF-related
hospitalizations compared with usual care.
Effects on other outcomes such as nursing
staff satisfaction and treatment adherence
were reported infrequently. All studies used
an RN who had autonomy to titrate medications,
and in most studies, initiated medications
per protocol.
The evidence review also examined how
well participating nurses adhered to the
protocol. The review found that while indirect
evidence (e.g., improved outcomes)
suggests nurses adhere to protocols, direct
evidence (e.g., through fidelity checks) is
insufficient to establish how well nurses adhere
to protocols when engaged in delivering
nurse-managed care.
Finally, the evidence review sought to determine
whether there are adverse effects
associated with the use of nurse-managed
protocols. Only one fair-quality study on
diabetes in a health maintenance organization
reported on adverse events. Severe low
blood glucose events were identical (1.5
percent) at baseline and increased similarly,
2.9 percent in the control group compared
with 3.1 percent in the intervention group.
With the implementation of PACTs, VA
has begun to reconfigure team-based care
models to expand the responsibilities of
team members, such as nurses, to practice
to the full extent of their education and
training. Results from this systematic review
and meta-analysis suggest that nursemanaged
protocols have positive effects on
the outpatient management of adults with
stable, common chronic conditions such
as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia,
and CHF. However, descriptions
of how nurses are trained to assume this
expanded role are not well reported. Additionally,
subgroup analyses showed some
differences between in-person and telephone-
based protocols. For example, interventions
delivered primarily by telephone
showed significantly greater effects for total
and LDL cholesterol in patients with elevated
cardiovascular risk, and greater mortality
reductions in patients with CHF.
Evidence exists to support the effectiveness
of nurse-delivered interventions in the
management of Veterans with diabetes.3
Efforts are also underway to develop and
test nurse-managed protocols in cardiology
at the Durham VAHCS. Nurses constitute
the largest healthcare workforce group
employed at VA, thus they are in an ideal
position to collaborate with other team
members to increase access of effective care
for Veterans with chronic diseases.
- Shaw RJ, et al. "Effects of Nurse-Managed Protocols
in the Outpatient Management of Adults with
Chronic Illness," VA-ESP Project #09-010; 2013.
- Shaw RJ, et al. "Effects of Nurse-managed Protocols
in the Outpatient Management of Adults
with Chronic Conditions: a Systematic Review and
Meta-analysis," Annals of Internal Medicine 2014;
161(2):113-21.
- Watts SA, Sood A, "Diabetes Nurse Case Management:
Improving Glucose Control: 10 Years of
Quality Improvement Follow-up Data," Applied
Nursing Research 2016; (29), 202-5.
To view VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program reports
or to nominate a review, go to www.hsrd.research.
va.gov/publications/esp/.
|